Laserfiche WebLink
Kirsten M. Kurath <br />Debeque Pit SWSP <br />August 6, 2007 <br />Page 4 <br />5 15% 35% <br />6 10% 20°l0 <br />7 5% 15% <br />S 0% 10% <br />1. Adapted from EVAPO' <br />MEADOWS, South Park, <br />14. The dry year ana <br />from the analysis <br />supply plan shall <br />statement of posi <br />of fact or conclus <br />the Applicant. <br />15. This substitute w: <br />determined that it <br />operation of this F <br />JSPIRATION AND AGRONOMIC RESPONSES IN F(}RMERLY IRRIGATED MOUNTAIN <br />~rado, March 1, 1990; Revised September 1, 1991 <br />required by this office for a permanent plan fi r augmentation may vary <br />roved in this substitute water supply plan. A proval of this substitute water <br />no precedential or evidentiary force, does n t constitute an admission or <br />in any other proceeding, and shall not imply oncurrence with any findings <br />of law contained herein, or with the engineenng methodologies used by <br />supply plan may be revoked or modified at ariy time should it be <br />r to other vested water rights has occurred or will occur as a result of the <br />16. Should this substitute water supply plan expire without renewal or tie revoked prior to <br />adjudication of a permanent plan for augmentation, all excavation of product from below the <br />water table and all other use of water at the pit must cease immediately. <br />17. In accordance withlamendments to CRS 25-8-202(7) and Senate Bill 89-181 Rules and <br />Regulations adopted on February 4, 1992, the State Engineer shall (determine if the substitute <br />supply is of a quality to meet requirements of use to which the senior appropriation receiving the <br />substituted supply has normally been put. As such, water quality data or analyses may be <br />requested at any time to determine if the requirements of use of the'senior appropriator are met. <br />18. The decision of thelState Engineer shall have not precedential or e~ <br />create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a de <br />case or any other I~gal action that may be initiated concerning the <br />not bind the State Engineer to act in a similar manner in any other <br />plans or in any proposed renewal of this plan, and shall not imply cc <br />of fact or conclustorjs of law contained herein, or with the engineerit <br />the Applicant. <br />Should you have any questions regarding this plan, please contact <br />Springs at (970) 945-5665, br Craig Lis in Denver at (303) 866-3581. <br />Sincerely, <br />Attachment: Table 9, <br />DW/CML/CJLAvcrNDebeque Pit M81 <br />cc: Alan Martellaro, Div <br />Mike Mello, District <br />Division of Minerals <br />VIGR VYVIIC,~ <br />Acting State <br />Balance <br />iii.doc <br />~n Engineer, Division 5 <br />Water Commissioner <br />id Geology <br />dentiary force, shall not <br />ense in any water court <br />WSP. This decision shall <br />~plications involving other <br />icurrence with any findings <br />a methodologies used by <br />Martellaro in Glenwood <br />