Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PHRIODIC INSPHCTION FORM <br />Stockponds or Sumps <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Roy Karo <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Stockpond <br />SITE NAME: T-24 <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II-W <br />MINE I.D, NO.: C-82-057 <br />DATE: 12/20/2001 <br />DATE LAST INSPECTION: 08/17/2001 <br />LOCATION: SW+,(NE'/,, Sec 9, TSN, R88W <br />LOCATION: 8 mi S of Hayden, CO <br />OWNER'S REP.: Gregg Kitchen Gen.Mgr. <br />Circle or write in appropriate response <br />1. Angle of slope: 3.9:1 upstream, 4.6:1 downstream Total = 8 .5:1 N/A <br />2. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes ~ N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes ~ N/A <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes <br />~ N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes ~ N/A <br />3. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes ~ N/A <br />9. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes 1~ N/A <br />5. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes ® N/A <br />6. *Major erosion problems: Yes ~ N/A <br />7. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes ~ N/A <br />8. *Erosion of toe: Yes 1~ N/A <br /> <br />9. *Water impounded against downstream toe: Yes ® N/A <br />10. Existing embankment freeboard: Approximately 6.2 feet <br />11. x Increase Decrease in water level: feet <br />12. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes ~ N/A <br />13. Spillway erosion: Yes ® N/A <br />14. *Clogging <br /> Spillway channels: Yes ~ N/A <br /> Diversion ditches: Yes N/A <br />*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to <br />the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse <br />conditions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, <br />etc.) in the space on the back of this sheet. <br />S3 <br />