My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO24483
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO24483
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:44:32 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:43:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980047
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
5/6/1983
Doc Name
RECOMMENDED STREAM CLASSIFICATION AND WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR SEGMENT 11
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUPIMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The Middle Fork and East Middle Fork drainages of Parachute Creek <br />are designated under Segment 11 by the Water Quality Control Commission <br />1 (WQCC) for setting stream use classifications and water quality <br />JJ standards. These drainages are proposed [o be classified for use as <br />~ Recreation Class 2, Cold Water Aquatic Life Class 1, Water Supply, and <br />Agriculture. Associated water quality standards have been proposed to <br />protect the proposed designated use. Proposed standards for metals to <br />protect aquatic life appear to be based on an assumed surface water <br />hardness or alkalinity concentration range of 100 to 300 milligrams per <br />litre. <br />Exxon Company USA owns land in both the Middle Fork and East <br />Middle Fork drainage. An analyses of water quality and aquatic life in <br />these basins has been conducted relative to the WQCC proposed use <br />classifications and standards. <br />t MIDDLE FORK AND DAVIS GULCH DRAINAGES <br />J It is the position of Exxon Company USA that based on our analysis <br />the proposed use classifications for the Middle Fork drainage are <br />inappropriate and unsupportable. <br />Water quality data were analyzed to establish background water <br />quality conditions and to identify parameters which have reported <br />-~ concentrations that both relate to the proposed uses and naturally <br />exceed the proposed standards. Naturally occurring conditions exceeded <br />1 the proposed standards for trivalent chromium, copper, lead, mercury, <br />selenium, cadmium, arsenic, zinc, nitrate, nitrite, boron, and sulfate. <br />The proposed water quality standards for protecting aquatic life <br />may be low since they appear to be based on an assumed alkalinity in <br />the range of 100 to 300 mg/1 while actual maximum alkalinity concen- <br />1 trations have been measured 341 and 537 mg/1. The condition of the <br />water chemistry in the Middle Fork drainage appears to be directly <br />related to the geologic formation of the area and is not perceived as <br />unique. <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.