Laserfiche WebLink
SUPIMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />The Middle Fork and East Middle Fork drainages of Parachute Creek <br />are designated under Segment 11 by the Water Quality Control Commission <br />1 (WQCC) for setting stream use classifications and water quality <br />JJ standards. These drainages are proposed [o be classified for use as <br />~ Recreation Class 2, Cold Water Aquatic Life Class 1, Water Supply, and <br />Agriculture. Associated water quality standards have been proposed to <br />protect the proposed designated use. Proposed standards for metals to <br />protect aquatic life appear to be based on an assumed surface water <br />hardness or alkalinity concentration range of 100 to 300 milligrams per <br />litre. <br />Exxon Company USA owns land in both the Middle Fork and East <br />Middle Fork drainage. An analyses of water quality and aquatic life in <br />these basins has been conducted relative to the WQCC proposed use <br />classifications and standards. <br />t MIDDLE FORK AND DAVIS GULCH DRAINAGES <br />J It is the position of Exxon Company USA that based on our analysis <br />the proposed use classifications for the Middle Fork drainage are <br />inappropriate and unsupportable. <br />Water quality data were analyzed to establish background water <br />quality conditions and to identify parameters which have reported <br />-~ concentrations that both relate to the proposed uses and naturally <br />exceed the proposed standards. Naturally occurring conditions exceeded <br />1 the proposed standards for trivalent chromium, copper, lead, mercury, <br />selenium, cadmium, arsenic, zinc, nitrate, nitrite, boron, and sulfate. <br />The proposed water quality standards for protecting aquatic life <br />may be low since they appear to be based on an assumed alkalinity in <br />the range of 100 to 300 mg/1 while actual maximum alkalinity concen- <br />1 trations have been measured 341 and 537 mg/1. The condition of the <br />water chemistry in the Middle Fork drainage appears to be directly <br />related to the geologic formation of the area and is not perceived as <br />unique. <br />i <br />