Laserfiche WebLink
will require the placement of conveyor belt, or similar ditch lining in the bottom of the ditch to minunize channel <br />erosion. <br />. During 1992 approximately 200,000 tons of low-quality coal were produced and placed in the stockpile. Likewise, <br />during ] 993 and 1994 350,000 tons of ]ow-quality coal were produced and stockpiled. Thereafter, low~uality coal <br />production rates have been variable, with a maximum of approximately 1,950,000 tons per yeaz oflow-quality coal <br />produced and processed. Low-quality coal produced during 1994 was placed in the low-quality coal stockpile. <br />During 1995 and in subsequent years, low-quality coal was placed in aloes-quality coal surge pile for direct feed to <br />the coal preparation plant and TCC started recovering the ]ow-quality coal from the existing stockpile at an annual <br />rate of ] 00,000 yards per year until all the low-quality coal was removed from the pile. production records, (ie: <br />truck or scraper load counts), were utilized to estimate of the amount of low-quality coal transported to and <br />subsequently recovered from the permanent disposal site. A total of approximately 550,000 tons of low-quality <br />coal were transported to, and subsequently recovered from, the permanent disposal site. <br />Construction of the preparation plant during 1994 and 1995 eliminated the need to haul the low-quality coal, <br />discussed in the above paragraph, to the permanent refuse pile. The plant was originally designed to have the <br />capability to produce 500,000 tons of clean coal per yeaz during a seasonal operating period of April through <br />September, with the potential to produce at higher levels by extending the operating period. Internal plant <br />modifications and progressive extension of coal washing operations to a year-round schedule have resulted in an <br />increase in throughput capacity to a maximum of approximately 1,200,000 tons of clean coal per year. It is <br />anticipated that actual clean coal output will range from approximately 700,000 to 1,200,000 tons per year, <br />dependent on demand. In order to produce this amount of clean coal, approximately 1,120,000 to 1,950,000 tons of <br />low-quality coal will be processed through the plant. With these throughput rates, approximately 420,000 to <br />750,000 tons/year of refuse would be generated and hauled to the approved refuse pile. <br />In order to finalize the designs for the permanent waste rock disposal site field studies were undertaken and <br />completed during the second quarter of 1992. The requued field studies were conducted during ]ate May and <br />• included a site reconnaissance, test borings and excavation of test pits. The location of the drilllroles and test pits <br />are shown on Map 23A. The following describe the proposed (and subsequently conducted) field studies for design <br />and construction of the waste rock disposal facility. <br />The borings will be approximately 80 feet deep, dependent upon spoil depth in the area. It is anticipated that the <br />borings will be made by an auger, or if this is not possible a rotary rig will be utilized. it may be necessary to <br />construct a pad for the auger or drill rig, and if so it will be approximately 30 x 30 feet. If it is necessary to <br />construct the pad the available topsoil will be sah~aged and stockpiled for fmal reclamation of the pad. The topsoil <br />may range in depth from 12 to 20 inches. All of the sites are located within an existing sediment control system, <br />therefore, secondary sediment control will not be needed for the pads. <br />It is planned to drive the auger or drill rig to the proposed boring locations without constructing roads or a pad. <br />This is dependent upon Bound conditions. If conditions are such that excessive rutting will occur, then topsoil will <br />be windrowed to the side of the road and pad. Existing roads will be utilized to the extent possible to minimize <br />distwbance. The borings will be made and the holes will be backfilled or gouted, unless it is determined that a <br />monitoring well should be constructed to monitor water levels in the spoil or bedrock. Any borings converted to <br />monitoring welts will be added to TCC's existing hydrologic monitoring plan. At such time, the appropriate <br />completion information will be forwarded to the MLRD, along with a monitoring schedule. <br /> <br />TR06-52 2.05-g8 02/17/06 <br />