Laserfiche WebLink
• N03-N and NH4N. Both nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen content <br />of the soils were significantly increased due to the addition of waste coal to <br />the soil at the Southfield Mine. Singleton and Barker (1980) presented data <br />suggesting that waste coal increased the N03-N content of mine spoils in <br />Wyoming. In North Dakota, Safaya et. al. (1982) reported that the addition <br />of slack coal to sodic spoil more than doubled the total N content of mine <br />spoil, however, they questioned the functional benefits of this added ntrogen. <br />Since plants readily utilize both nitrate and ammonium forms of nitrogen, it <br />appears that the addition of waste coal acts as a form of fertilizer. This <br />finding is consistent wdh the North Dakota work of Mutakondaiah and Safaya <br />(1982) who reported that leonardfte had a positive effect on plant growth <br />when no or low levels of supplemental nitrogen were applied. These data <br />suggest that waste coal could be an important source of supplemental <br />nitrogen during the reclamation process. Upon applying the nitrogen criteria <br />for agronomic soils (SoRanpour et. al. 1985) to these mine soils it shows that <br />75 percent of the Southfield Mine coal amended soils have adequate nitrate <br />nitrogen levels, while virtually all of the unamended soils would require <br />supplemental nitrogen fertilization for optimum plant growth. Therefore, the <br />coal amended soils appear to be superior in terms of nitrogen suitability as <br />a plant growth media to the non coal amended soils at the Southfield Mine. <br />Fe and Mn. Increased levels of Fe and Mn are indicative that acidification <br />• has occurred. Elevated concentrations of these elements on the coal <br />amended soils confirms the fact that the decrease in pH, apparently caused <br />as a result of acid cation, has increased the Fe and Mn content of the coal <br />amended soils. <br />The trend of increased Fe concentration in soils where pyrites have <br />oxidized is consistent with the findings reported by Barrau and Berg (1977). <br />No suspect levels of Fe or Mn are given in either the WDEO or NMMMD <br />guidelines, however, Schafer (1979) suggested that the Mn concentrations of <br />mine soils should not exceed 60 ppm. The maximum Mn concentration <br />found on the coal amended soils was 23 ppm, well below the proposed <br />suspect level. <br />A minimum level of 3 ppm Fe is required to avoid deficiencies of this <br />essential plant element (Softanpour et. al. 1985). Applying this criteria, <br />adequate levels of Fe are present on 88 percent of the coal amended soils <br />white adequate levels of iron are present on only 29 percent of the non coal <br />amended soils. Wdh respect to Fe fertility levels, it appears that the coal <br />amended soils have a better suitability than the non coal amended soils. <br />~. Increased levels of Cu were associated with the coal amended soils at <br />the Southfield Mine. These trends are similar to the findings in North Dakota <br />reported by Malakondaiah and Safaya (1982) wherein they stated that Cu <br />levels were higher on slack coal treated spoil. Using the criteria <br />recommended in Sottanpour et. al. (1985) it is suggested that all of the soil <br />• materials have adequate Cu levels. However, it appears that the increased <br />availability of Cu on coal amended soils renders the Cu levels on these <br />materials more suitable than levels encountered on non coal amended soils. <br />Implications are that higher levels of plant growth can be expected from the <br />coal treated soils. <br />26 <br />