My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE55696
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE55696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:58:27 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:42:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 09 COMPARISON OF REFUSE AND SOIL SUITABILITIES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• prepared a well documented summary of the processes involved in coal <br />processing. Among the findings of this review are that coal refuse materials <br />following benefication normally contain higher sulfur levels than do the <br />untreated coals. Cavallaro et. al. (1978) reported that the elevated trace <br />element concentrations normally associated with coal processing are <br />associated with the inorganic matter fraction and that concentrations of Cd, <br />Cr, Cu, F, Hg, Mn, Ni, and Pb all increased in proportion to the amount of <br />inorganic matter content. These trends were consistent for eastern as well <br />as western coals. Hamblen et. al. (1980) studied various eastern and western <br />coals and concluded that the sulfur content of westem coats as a rule was <br />consideraby lower than that found in almost all eastern coals. Kuhn et. al. <br />(1980) compared the trace element content of western coals from Montana, <br />Arizona and Wyoming with various coals from the eastern and midwest coal <br />producing areas and concluded that western coals contain much lower trace <br />element concentrations and contain the largest number of nonleachable <br />elements. The leachate from Montana coals were studied by Gerhart et. al. <br />(1980) to determine the potential pollution impacts of runoff from coal <br />stockpiles on the aquatic environment. They reported that compared to <br />eastern coals, the leaching of western coal removes only a very small <br />percentage of the metals present in these coals, and from a pollution <br />standpoint, the metals leached from western coals are produced in such <br />small amounts that they are relatively 'unimportarrt' as potential pollutants. <br />• This review clearly demonstrates that the properties and associated <br />environmental impacts of western coals are much different than associated <br />eastern coals. <br />LITERATURE ON THE ACIDIFICATION OF WESTERN COAL REFUSE <br />AND SPOIL MATERIALS. <br />The occurrence of acidic mine soils in the western states is considerably <br />less common than found in the eastern states. Contrary to the somewhat <br />popular belief, acidic mine spoils are much more common in the west than <br />many have believed possible. In what was probably the earliest systematic <br />reclamation research conducted in the western states, researchers at the <br />University of Wyoming reported that acidity was the major factor affecting <br />revegetation success on mine spoils in the Kemmerer Coal Field in <br />southwestern Wyoming (Jacoby 1969 and May et. al. 1971). This early <br />research demonstrated that as a whole the area could be considered as <br />'acidic.' The pH of spoil three years of age was reported to average 4.1, with <br />a trend of increasing pH values as the spoil weathered. In a subsequent <br />study of abandoned mine spoil in Wyoming, Singleton and Barker (1980) <br />reported that acidic conditions had developed on 40 year old spoil while pH <br />values on 16 year old spoil were all somewhat alkaline. They reported that <br />acidic conditions (pH 5.77) had developed because the waste coal that was <br />mixed into the spoil had oxidized. Acidic conditions developed on one site <br />• because the initial calcium carbonate levels were very low and were quickly <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.