My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE55490
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE55490
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:58:18 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:36:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004078
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/14/2005
Doc Name
mlrb order
From
mlrb
To
dmt
Section_Exhibit Name
sw tko joint ventrure llc
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. This Board has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this proceeding <br />pursuant to Section 34-32.5-114, C.R.S. (2004). <br />The Board appointed a prehearing conference officer who conducted a prehearing <br />conference on Apri129, 2005 in Denver, Colorado. Parties who appeared at the prehearing <br />conference included the Applicant and objectors Jerry Landrus and CDOT. On April 15, <br />2005, the Division received a withdrawal letter from the City of Fort Lupton. Following the <br />prehearing conference, the prehearing conference officer prepared a proposed prehearing <br />order. <br />The Board approved the proposed prehearing order, with two revisions. First, the parties <br />agreed to rephrase issue three and asked the Board to revise the prehearing order so that that <br />issue read as follows: "Has the Applicant demonstrated that the culverts can safely handle <br />the designed flow from dewatering and a legal right to use the culverts and associated <br />structures owned by the Colorado Department of Transportation adjacent to and underneath <br />Highway 85?" Second, the prehearing conference order was revised to show that the <br />Objectors had 80 minutes to make their presentation. <br />The issues set forth in the prehearing order are: <br />(1). Has the Applicant addressed how erosion will be controlled to protect areas, <br />including the highway structure, outside the affected lands? The following areas <br />are a concern to CDOT: (Construction Materials Rules 3.1.5(3) & 6.4.6)) <br />a. wave action erosion on the permanent pond embankments; and <br />b. erosion from the 1:2 slopes of the excavated area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.