Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. Wn1er Quality Control Division <br />Rationale - Pnge l9, Permit No. CO-0034/47 <br />F. Specific Compliance Requiremertts <br />1. Submi.rcions !o the Division: The following are specific compliance items which require permittee action. Please check <br />the rejer'enced ports ojthe permit jar detulLc on what i.c required. <br />Code Event Permit C/!at/on Due Date <br />90508 h1nterinlc Conminmem Plnn -Update 1. E. 1. 90 dnvc after effective dote <br />90199 Stormxater Management Plrrn /.C.6. First Report is due <br />Annual Reports Feburnv /5, 1995 <br />Dr'ujler: A/erunder S. hlichui/idi.r (Science Applicntion.c /mernationu/ Corporation) <br />Jaly ?, 1999 <br />Revised by: Jan C. Kubic <br />hlnrclt ! 5. l 999 <br />V//. PUBL/C NOT/CE COMMENTS <br />The permittee commen[ed. <br />^ They reyae.cted that the legal and jrcility contact peerons be changed from the person specified in the draft. The jnciliN <br />contact will be changed n.r reyue.r[ed; however, the Division has determined that the legal ,ron[ne[ should be the person who <br />signed the renewal application, in conjor'mnnce with Divi.rron policy. <br />^ They questioned the change in the iron limitntiat jar outjdls 009, 022 and 024. The Divi.rr'on reevaluated the basis jar this <br />ehnnge and determined dm1 the lirnitntion .should story at LO rag/^ for rota! recoverable iron. <br />^ Thee questioned why [lee renewal permit dirt not continue the higher upper pHlimi[nrion jar outfa(l 024. The Division <br />reevaluated this and decider/ to continue rhi.r higher upper /imitation. <br />^ The permittee reyue.cted that the WET language be clnrfijed. Since dte draft permit wuc completed the Division established <br />WET language bn.red on a recem Division policy. This uew WET lnngunge has been incoroora[ed into [he renewal permit. <br />/n addition, dte three outfulls subject to WET - outfiills' 003. 022 and 024. hove been looked a[ n.c one irnpuct m the receiving <br />water due to [heir prosirnity [o each other. T/ti.r recu/ts in only chronic WET conditions npo/ving to u!l three ou[jn/lc. <br />^ The permittee verbally commented on dte bnri.r for the ehnnge in jecn! coliform lirnitation.r ut outjall 023. The Division <br />checked this and found that it was' appropriate 7o continue the previous limitntion.r oj6.000/12.000 per l00 m^~ <br />While the Division was reviewing the draft renewal permit for con.cidernlion of dre permi[tee'.c comments, it was de(errnined that <br />other changes were appropriate. <br />^ The comhined flow.cpecified in previous penni[s for outfa//.c 003, 022 and 024 hoc been continued. The permittee hn.c <br />indlcn[ed [hat no change in the sy.etem hn.t' occurred: thus, continuing dri.r /low is appropriate. The wider quality bn.ced <br />limimtionr were recnlculn[ed using this flow. Table V/-6 has been mor/ified accordingly. .Vo ehnnge to /imitations', o[her <br />than/low, re.nd[ed. <br />C The Division embellished .carne aren.c ojthe rationale to explain the reevaluation [hat occurred. AdditionnQv, the jorrnnt of <br />dte permit hur been revised somecahn! to clarify the permit conditions. <br />Jon C. Knbir <br />Munch l5. 1994 <br />