Laserfiche WebLink
• shown on Map 24, Surface Facilities. As described under Rule 2.05.3(4)(b), a small exemption area for <br />sedimentation control has been granted for the rockdus[ tank access/unloading area. t o,,, ~,y~,,.,.a~ t'~mad ~'°t'` ` I "` <br />C~^^" <br />Evidence that revegetation goals are attainable is found in previous revegetation efforts in the area by <br />CYCC. Herbage production on its nearby Energy Mine No. 2 bond release area, seeded in May 1974, is <br />indicative of the productivity that can be expected on reclaimed sites within the proposed Foidel Creek <br />Mine permit boundary, since the seed mixture used on the Energy Mine No. 2 reclamation tract contained <br />many of the same herbaceous species proposed in this permit application. Forage production on the bond <br />release site was described by the Soil Conservation Service as 1,00 pounds of air dry forage per acre in <br />unfavorable years, 2,000 pounds during median years and 2,500 pounds in favorable years. After two <br />,rowing seasons, seeded grasses on the reclaimed tract were producing 244 pounds of air dry forage per <br />acre. The third year after planting (August 1977) was the driest ever recorded in northwestern Colorado <br />and [he production of seeded species increased [o an average of 705 pounds per acre. In 1978, a median <br />year, production averaged 2,212 pounds per acre. In 1979, a favorable year, forage production climbed to <br />an average of 2,626 pounds of air dry forage per acre. In 1983 and 1984, years of high precipitation. <br />production on the gazing study being conducted on nearby reclaimed land was 4,400 Ibs/acre and 5,600 <br />Ibs/acre, respectively. Based upon the results obtained from the Enemy Mine No_ 2 reclamation tract, <br />premise productivity should be reinstated on all revegetated areas within 3 to 4 years after seeding. <br />l~hc ability of the proposed seed mixtures to control erosion is directly related to the vegetative cover <br />produced by the planted species. Data collected on [he Energy i'vtine No. 2 bond release site in 1977 <br />,/indicated that the total cover averaged 60 percent. Plant cover data compiled in 1979 documented that the <br />total cover on the site averaged 86.9 percent. Comparison of ground cover and production data indicates <br />that for the voluntary reclamation done in 1974, approximately five years were needed before total ground <br />• cover values approached the premise status. <br />On the more recent reclamation performed on [he CYCC mine, Area 10, forage production the first <br />,rowing season was equal to that found on [he two and one half year old 1974 Energy Mine No. 2 seeding. <br />Cover is expected to reach premising levels after approximately three years. The plant species proposed <br />for the revegetation seed mixtures are capable of providing the soil stabilization needed [o control erosion. <br />Prom the standpoint of ground cover, the erosion potential of successfully revegetated mined land should <br />not exceed the rate of geological erosion found on adjacent natural areas. <br />Introduced Snecics <br />In accordance with Rule 4.15.2, Use of Introduced Species, TCC requests approval for the following introduced <br />species within [he three perennial seed mixtures. <br />Pastureland Secd 117ixture <br />The pastureland mixture consists primarily of introduced plan[ species, as shown in Table 53, Pastureland Seed <br />Mixhtre. These species are of the same seasonal variety as were found on the site prior to mining and are the <br />species utilized locally for intensively managed pastureland. If all native species +vere established on this site, <br />there would be a significant reduction in the productivity and utility of the pastureland; thereby, reducing the <br />potential for meeting the postmine land use of pastureland. <br />The pastureland species ro be used by TCC are those recommended by Tucker and Hen•ey (1957) and Steward <br />• (1973). The introduced species are documented in these records as beins of superior utility for forage production. <br />These recommended speaes are compatible with post-mining land uses and are not noxious. <br />~4R 97-I i4 2.05-110 Revised 9/9/97 <br />