Laserfiche WebLink
Yart I <br />Page No. 13 <br />Permit No.: CO-0043648 <br />If accelcrated testing is being performed, the permittee shall provide written notification of the results within <br />14 calendar days of completion of the "Pattern of Toxicity"/"No Toxicity" demonstration. Testing will be at <br />least once every two weeks for up to five tests until; I) two consecutive tests fail or three of five tests fail, to which <br />case a pattem of toxicity has been demonstrated or 2) two consecutive tests pass or three of five tests pass, in which <br />case no pattem of toxicity has been found. [f no pattem of toxicity is found the toxicity episode is considered to be <br />ended and routine testing is to restune. If a pattem of toxicity is found, a PTI/fIE investigation is to be performed. <br />If a pattem of toxicity is not demonstrated but a signiticant level of erratic toxicity ~s found, the Diyiston may require <br />an increased frequency of routine monitoring or some other modified approach. <br />(e) PTI/CiE <br />The results of the PTLTIE investigation are to be received by the Division within 120 days of the <br />demonstration of acute or chronic WET in the routine test, as defined above, or if accelerated tes[ine is <br />performed, the date the pattern of toxicity is demonstrated. A status report is to be provided to the Division <br />at the 30, 60 and 90 day ooints of the PTUfIE investigation. The Division may extend the time frame for <br />investigation where reasonablejustification exists. A request for an extension must be made in writing and received <br />prior to the 120 day deadline. Such request must include a justification and supporting data for such an extension. <br />The permittee may use the time for investigation to conduct a PTI or move directly into the Tom. A PTI consists of a <br />brief search for possible sources of WET, which might reveal causes of such tonicity and appropnate corrective <br />actions more simply and cost effectively than a formal TIE. If the PTI allows resolution of the WET incident, the <br />TIE need not necessarily be conducted. If, however, WET is not identified or resolved during the PTI, the TIE must <br />be conducted within the allowed 120 day time frame. <br />Any permittee that is required to conduct a PTUI'IE investigation shall do so in conformance with procedures <br />identified in the following documents, or as subsequently updated.l) Toxicity Identification Evaluation: <br />Characterization of Chronically Toxic Effluents. Phase I, EPA/600/6-91 /OOSF May 92, 2) Methods for Aquatic <br />Toxicity Identification Evaluations. Phase 1 Toxiciri Characterization Procedures, EPA/600/6-91 /003 Feb. 91 and 3) <br />Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations Phase !I Toxicity identification Procedwes, EPA/600/3- <br />88/035 Feb. 1989. <br />A fourth document in this series is Methods for Aquatic Toxiciri Identification Evaluations, Phase II[ Toxicity <br />Confirmation Procedures, EPA/600/3-88/036 Feb. 1989. As indicated by the title, this procedure is intended to <br />confum that the suspected toxicant is wly the toxicant. This investigation is optional. <br />Within 90 days of the determination of the toxicant or no later than 210 days after demonstration of toxicity, <br />whichever is sooner, a control program is to be developed and received by the Division. The program shall set down <br />a method and procedure far elimination of the toxicity to acceptable levels. <br />(f) Reouest For Relief <br />The permittee may request relief from further investigation and testing where the toxicant has not been determined <br />and the Division has determined suitable treatment does not appear possible. in requesting such relief, the permittee <br />shall submit material sufficient [o establish the following: <br />(i) I[ has complied with terms and conditions of the permit compliance schedule for the PTI/fIE investigation and <br />other appropriate conditions as may have been required by the Division; <br />(ii) During the period of the toxicity incident it has been incompliance with all other permit conditions, including, <br />in the case of aPOT W,pre-treatment requirements, <br />(iii) During the period of the toxicity incident it has properly maintained and operated all facilities and systems of <br />treatment and control; and <br />(iv) Despite the circumstances described in paragraphs (i) and (iii) above, the source and/or cause of toxicity could <br />not be located or resolved. <br />