My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE55100
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE55100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:58:02 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:27:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/25/2003
Doc Name
pages 2.05-59 through 2.05-116
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.05.6 <br />PHC North Fork of the Gunnsion River <br /> <br />r1 <br />L J <br />PR-08 <br />A PPRaVEt) <br />9~~ s/o.3 <br /> Flow m Flow cfs Iron m ~ Mn pp~ <br />North Fork 11,220 25 0.37 0.016 <br />Gob Leachate Dischar a 5.3 0.01 332 7.5 <br />Coal Pile Leachate 4.7 0.01 9 1 <br />Combined Flow 11,230 25.02 0.53 0.020 <br />Based upon the above calculation, if leachate from the gob and coal piles reached <br />the North Fork of the Gunnison River, it will not have a significant impact on the <br />quality of water in the river. A full suite analysis of the alluvial wells will be obtained <br />twice per year to determine if the coal or gob pile leachate has an impact on the <br />water quality in the wells. <br />The predicted pH of the gob pile leachate ranges from 8.0 to 8.7 which should not <br />have an adverse effect on the North Fork of the Gunnison River which has pH <br />values in the 8.5 range. The one sample available to predict the pH of the coal <br />leachate is 9.1 which is a little high. However, based on the predicted low flow of <br />coal pile leachate (4.7 gpm) the high pH value should not adversely impact the river. <br />Flooded mine workings could also impact the water quality in the area. When the <br />mines are sealed they will slowly fill with water. Although no data for permeability <br />or transmissivity of the saturated portions of the coal bearing member of the <br />MesaverdeFormationareavailablewithinthepermitarea, the experience by others <br />(Brooks, 1983) suggests the Mesaverde Formation transmits little water. Therefore, <br />the abandoned mine workings would not be expected to transmit water to the <br />surrounding strata. The quality of the water in the flooded mine workings could be <br />similar to the water in old Oliver Mine No. 1 located east of Somerset, CO which <br />mined in the D-Seam in the 1940's and 1950's. This mine is discharging water that <br />is monitored by Oxbow Carbon & Minerals as spring 8. This "spring" water has a <br />conductivity in the range of 3,000 to 4,000 umhos/cm (ref. OCM 1994 Annual <br />Hydrologic Report}. The salinity characteristics of the Oliver No. 1 Mine discharge <br />are similar to the assumed quality of the mine water discharge presented above. <br />Based on the above discussion, if the mine workings fill with water and discharge <br />through the portals, the impact on the North Fork of the Gunnison River would be <br />less than or equal to the mine water discharge analysis presented above. <br />2.05 - 75i - 07/03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.