My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE54964
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE54964
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:57:55 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:23:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002020
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/7/2002
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DMG
To
City of Greeley
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lined Pit Guide 13 Sentember 2000 <br />Post Construction Testing <br />Typically, post construction testing will be conducted in accordance with the "State Engineer <br />Guidelines for Lining Criteria for Gravel Pits," August 1999, section 3.1. This document is available <br />from the Office of the State Engineer or online at http://water.state.co.us/pits.htm. Once an Operator <br />can document that the State Engineer has determined the lined pit meets performance standards, the <br />Division of Minerals and Geology can release the portion of the bond that covers clay liner installation <br />PERMITTING OPTIONS <br />Frequently, the process of permitting a gravel pit and lined reservoir project precedes the design phase <br />making it difficult and costly to prepaze and application that will qualify for the regulated construction <br />option and the reduced bond amount. The following list describes permitting mechanisms that may be <br />employed to allow application approval prior to design and specification preparation and preserve the <br />option to post the reduced bond amount available under the regulated construction option. <br />• An application could include a general description of the clay liner or slurry wall installation, <br />similaz to what would be sufficient under the 100 percent performance bonding option. The application <br />would be approved with a commitment stating that a liner or slurry wall design, specifications, and <br />quality assurance plan would be submitted as a technical revision and the revision would be approved <br />prior to the exposure of ground water in the pit. <br />• An applicant may find it difficult to design a clay liner mix and specifications for gradation and <br />plasticity until after a pit has been opened up and representative samples of overburden and underlying <br />bedrock can be collected. In order to permit and bond for a clay liner when the liner soil specifications <br />have not yet been developed, an Applicant may include in the bond a cost for mixing bentonite into the <br />liner soil. This will assure that a low permeability material can be created from virtually any fine <br />grained overburden, even if the overburden is non-plastic. The amount of bond dedicated to adding and <br />mixing in of bentonite may be released once the pit soils have been tested and demonstrated to be <br />suitable for lining. <br />• There are circumstances where an Applicant proposes to install a slurry wall prior to initial <br />excavation in the pit. This method has the advantage minimizing water inflows and dewatering costs <br />during mining. If an Applicant commits to complete installation of the slurry wall prior to exposing <br />ground water in the pit, and can demonstrate that the slurry wall performs up the standards established <br />by the State Engineer, bonding for the slurry wall maybe waived. However, it may be difficult to <br />demonstrate that the slurry wall is performing up to standard until after the pi[ has been excavated and <br />the rate of any inflows can be measured over time. If an Operator can provide the Division with a <br />construction report and engineer's certification of the slurry wall prior to the exposure of ground water, <br />and the Division accepts that the report and certification demonstrate that the slurry wall will function <br />up to standazd, then the operation would be eligible for the reduced (20 percent of replacement cost) <br />slurry wall bond. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.