Laserfiche WebLink
their instrumentation was 15 Hz which would filter out a major portion of the energy <br />spectrum and result in significant underestimation of total ground motion. The report <br />does not provide any supporting data regazding the spectral response of the seismometer, <br />calibration corrections for sensor coupling to the ground, filters employed in the <br />recording instrument, or impulse response tests of the system that allow independent <br />analysis of the system spectral response. Without documentation on the calibration of <br />sensor response to ground motion for the specific site, the reported displacements and <br />velocities cannot be considered to be reliable. <br />4) There is no discussion regarding the type of waves (compressional, shear, and <br />Rayleigh) produced by various equipment and their relative amplitudes and decay <br />rates. <br />Seismic energy generated by heavy equipment can take several forms including <br />compressional waves, horizontal and vertical sheaz waves, and Rayleigh surface waves. <br />Each wave type produces a different ground motion, has a different decay rate, and can <br />impact the stability of jointed blocks in the Rollins cliff in a different manner. Vertical <br />loading of the ground surface generates compressional waves, vertical sheaz waves, and <br />Rayleigh surface waves. Surface waves propagate in two dimensions and have low <br />attenuation rates, low frequencies, and can transmit significant amplitudes at large <br />distances. Depending upon the geometry between the direction of propagation and the <br />orientation of a joint face, each wave type can produce a component of shear and <br />compressional motion on joint surfaces (Dobrin 1976, Grant and West 1965). The Revey <br />report fails to discuss the nature and potential impact of various forms of motion and only <br />relates impacts to dilation of cracks. The nature of the interaction of induced vibrations <br />with rock fractures and slope stability is far more complex than depicted in the Revey <br />report (see Coates, 1970, chapter 8). <br />5) The analysis of simple harmonic motion in the Revey report does not account for <br />mechanisms that produce the highest amplitude ground motions such as <br />waveguides, normal mode propagation, and natural resonance. <br />Local seismic velocity structure can have a strong influence upon the mode of <br />propagation of seismic energy and can create waveguides and standing waves that <br />amplify ground motion and reduce attenuation rates dramatically relative to propagation <br />in a homogeneous half-space. These effects are site specific and dependent upon the <br />geologic setting, variation of seismic velocity with depth, and geometry of the source <br />relative to local features. The presence of the quartz cemented Rollins sandstone at <br />shallow depths below the proposed quarry site should produce a low velocity waveguide <br />in the overlying sediments that could create standing wave propagation confined between <br />the free surface at the Rollins outcrop and the continuous source produced by the rock <br />crusher. Certain frequencies in the source could resonate with this fundamental length <br />producing standing waves that would have amplitudes faz greater than that predicted from <br />measurements made in a homogeneous environment such as the Austin site (sce Figure <br />2). The simple harmonic motion model used in the Revey report cannot account for many <br />