My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE54840
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE54840
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:57:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:20:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 47 Design Criteria for MB-5 & MB-6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT B <br />• <br />~\ <br />,~ 6~ <br />fNGINEERS• <br />~.`AU ICJ i <br />\~~ <br />MICHAEL BAKER, JR., Ir~C. <br />ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS <br />Two MARKET TOWER, SUITE 9+1 <br />7025 SOUTH PARKER ROAD <br />AURORA. COLORADO BOO~a <br />TELE PMOME. ]0},54+95E <br />,• <br /> <br />6pri1 t2, t?8t: <br />Na. Larry Wisneski <br />anaconda Minerals Company <br />555 - t7 Street <br />Deaver, Colorado 80202 <br />Subject: West Elk Coal Company <br />Retaining Wall <br />Dear Mr. Wisneski: <br />The retaining wall designed by our firm shown on Draxiag Numbers <br />MG-O1-2-00, 5-001 - S-C11 and C-001 - C-002 and outlined in the technical <br />specifications is designed for the following conditions: <br />a. Loads <br />Equivalent Fluid Pressure = X15 lbs/cubic feet <br />Weight of Soil = 120 lbs/cubic feet <br />Live load = 2.5 feet <br />b. The wall design is not dependent upon the passive resistance of the <br />soil oe the down hill face. <br />c. The structural stabllity of the wall is designed to be dependent upon <br />deep, predrilled, concrete encased, soldier beams embedded is competent <br />bedrock. <br />It is therefore our professional opinion based upon accepted engineering <br />procedures and practice that the call should perform as designed provided <br />that proper construction quality control, field inspection and construc- <br />tion of the wall is in compliance with the design drawings. <br />We believe this letter should be sufficient for your submittal to the <br />State, however if you have need of additicaal clarification please don't <br />hesitate to contact us. <br />~"= =~ <br />l" ° '~ <br />~, rp0 •~Er_. <br />Sincerely, <br />MICSpEL BP.KEA, JA., INC. <br />r; <br />David J. Greenwood, P.E. <br />CO-PE dt?773 <br />Haaager of Engineering <br />Denver/Rocky Mountain Aegioao <br />DJG:lb <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.