Laserfiche WebLink
--;-~ -- <br />~~ ~ • • - , <br />Page Two of Two March 13, 1980 <br />The effect on the ground water table due to water losses from the gravel <br />pits is unlikely to be measurable at distances of more than a few hun- <br />dred feet from the margins of the pit. This conclusion is based upon the <br />high aquifer transmissivity and unconfined water table conditions at the <br />proposed quarry sites. '+ <br />3. The quarry pits~are unlikely to affect water flow in the Greeley No. 2 <br />Canal (The New Cache La Poudre Irrigating Company) if quarrying is <br />limited to distances of at least 200 feet from the ditch. <br />4. The gravel quarrying operation is subject to the same stringent Colorado <br />State regulations on water use that would be applied, for example, to <br />a proposed irrigation well at the same site. <br />The Colorado State Engineer's office does review the data on consumptive <br />use of water by gravel quarrying operations and ascertains if potentially <br />detrimental effects on existing water rights could arise. It is possible <br />that a quarrying operation could be required to replace or augument water <br />to the stream system to compensate for their consumptive use of ground <br />water. ~~T <br />In summary, the potential for detrimental effects on irrigation rights, irrigation dit- <br />ches, and water wells in the immediate vicinity of the proposed quarry operation appears to <br />be nil. If the State Engineer's office finds that a significant amount of water is consumed <br />due to the quarry operation, that office can impose appropriate water augmentation require- <br />ments on the quarry operators in order to protect existing water rights. <br />If there are any questions regarding this report, feel free to give me a call. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />GEOLOGIC RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS <br />AND DEVELOPMENT <br />~ ~~ /~ ~~ <br />James P. Waltz/, Ph.D. <br />Hydrogeologist <br />-; <br />i <br />