Laserfiche WebLink
_-..-~. <br />`~ <br />~II ~II~II~II~~~~~I~ <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />1713 Sherman SI., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80207 <br />Phone: 1703) 866-7567 <br />FAX. 1303) 8728106 <br />May 6, 1996 <br />~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Mr. John Kubic Roy Ramer <br />Governor <br />Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment <br />W CD-PE-B2 lames Eochhead <br />Q E.ecun ~c Direao~ <br />4300 Cherry Creek Drive South ngichael B. Long <br />Denver, COlOradO 80222 Division Duecto~ <br />RE: Red Canyon Mine, CDPS ,i/ C-850020 <br />File No. C-81-034 <br />Dear Mr. Kubic: <br />In a phone discussion of April 30, I described the situation <br />regarding the sedimentation pond at the Red Canyon Mine near <br />Cedaredge, operated by MINREC, INC. The Red Canyon Mine is a small <br />underground coal mine, with approximately 20 acres of surface <br />disturbance. The entire disturbed area with the exception of the <br />sediment pond, a segment of access road, and various collection and <br />diversion ditches, was regraded and seeded in 1988. The operator <br />has recently applied for retention of the pond as a permanent <br />impoundment for wildlife use. <br />As I explained, the primary water source for the pond would be <br />irrigation drainage water which is currently diverted around the <br />pond. A section of the diversion would need to be re-routed to <br />direct water into the pond, and we would like to have this work <br />completed this year to evaluate functioning of the channel <br />modification and impoundment prior to final bond release <br />(anticipated in 1998). An effective vegetation cover has been <br />established on the reclaimed site, and although the pond is still <br />in .place, DMG approved sediment pond removal in 1992, based on <br />sediment demonstrations made by the operator. <br />Modification of the diversion to direct irrigation drainage water <br />into the pond would seem to be precluded as long as the CDPS permit <br />remains in effect. You indicated that since we determined that the <br />pond is no longer necessary for sediment control, and its current <br />and future use would be solely for agricultural or wildlife use, <br />the operator would be eligible to request de-activation of the CDPS <br />permit at this time, and the discharge permit could in fact be de- <br />activated prior to final DMG bond release. <br />