My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE54703
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE54703
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:57:43 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:17:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/23/2004
Doc Name
Proposed Waste Rock Disposal Area, Cedar Creek Assoc, October 2003
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume III Exhibit 05 Baseline Vegetation Survey
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The standard of zero (0) is still recommended for the variable of woody plant density given the <br />paucity of grassland habitats in the vicinity of mine disturbances and the relatively small acreages <br />involved. Assuming that revegetation of this new disturbance area occurs in a manner similar to other <br />reclamation efforts in the general area, such success standards should be reasonably achievable. <br />With regard to diversity, the current standard for other Bowie mine area disturbances should be <br />reasonably achievable and therefore, applicable to the new WRDA. In effect, this standard requires post- <br />mining revegetation to exhibit 4 perennial species with between 3% and 47% relative cover, and at least <br />one of these must be a perennial forb or shrub. This standard is deemed reasonably achievable as it is <br />very similar to the standard utilized at the Tomahawk Mine that resulted in Phase III release in 2001. <br />Furthermore, the current seed mixes proposed for use at the mine appear sufficiently diverse to effect a <br />community that wilt pass such diversity testing following 10 years of growth and development. <br />In this regard, the following table presents proposed success criteria and technical standards to be <br />utilized in a weiohted evaluation protocol that complies with Colorado's "Guideline Regarding Selected <br />Coal Mine Bond Release Issues" (April 18, 1995). Procedures used to collect comparison data would be <br />similar to those used for this baseline evaluation (e.g., point-intercept along line-transects for ground <br />cover). At the time of this writing, the approved comparison technique involves the "reverse null <br />hypothesis testing procedure" as detailed in the April 18, 1995 guidelines. Such a procedure does not <br />require sampling efforts to achieve any specified level of adequacy, although it is in the operator's best <br />interest to collect a reasonably large sample to reduce variance. <br />Reference Area Comparisons and Technical Standards <br />Revegetated Ground Current Annual Woody Plant Diversity <br />Community Cover Production Density Standard <br />Entire WRDA 90% of weighted 90% of weighted No 3 Per. Grasses + <br />As a single unit JW & MS JW & MS Standard 1 Per. Forb or <br />Reference Area's Reference Area's Shrub between <br />Herbaceous Herbaceous 3% & 47% <br />Perennial Cover Perennial Production Relative Cover <br />i• <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, inc. Page 7.8 Exhibit 5 -Bowie WRDA Vegetation Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.