My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO24010
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO24010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:44:16 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:17:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
6/18/1990
Doc Name
QTRLY SEDIMENTATION POND INSPECTIONS SENECA II-W MINE
From
PEABODY COAL CO WESTERN DIV
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
SEDIMENT POND INSPECTIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM <br />Water, Sediment, or Slurry Impoundments <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Dennis Jones DATE: 5/7/90 <br />NPDES I.D. NO.: CO-0000 2 D.P. 006 <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Cross-Valle Pond DATE LAST INSPECTION: 3/6/90 <br />SITE NAME: Pond 1100 LOCATION: NW; ,NW#, Sec.22,T5N,R88W <br />MINE NAME: Seneca Mine I -W Pea ody Coa Co LOCATION: 8 mi. S of Hayden, C <br />MINE I.D. NO.: CMLRD Permit No. C-82-057 OWNER'S REP.: Don Zulian, Supt. <br />Circle or write in aoorooriate response <br />1. Foundation preparation (removal of vegetation, stumps, topsoil): _ ~e No N/A <br />2. Lift thickness: 12 in. N/A <br /> <br />3. Compaction according to approved plan: Ye No N/A <br />4. Burning (specify extent and location): Yes No <br />5. Angle of slope: 3:1 upstream, 3:1 downstream Total = 6:1 N/A <br />6. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> From underdrain pipes: Yes No !~/. <br /> At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes ® N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes ® N/A <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes ® N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes ® N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes ® N/A <br />7. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes ® N/A <br />8. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes ® N/A <br />9. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes ~ N/A <br />10. *Major erosion problems: Yes ® N/A <br />11. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: See comments Ye No N/A <br />12. *Erosion of toe: Yes ® N/A <br />13. *Water impounded against toe: Yes ® N/A <br />14. Existing embankment freeboard: See Comments 15 feet <br />15. X Increase Decrease in water level: See comments 9 feet <br />16. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes ® N/A <br />17. Visible sumps or sinkholes in slurry surface: Yes ~ N/A <br />18. *Clogging <br /> Spillway channels and pipes: Yes ® y/~ <br /> Decant system: Yes No ~ <br />/ <br />A <br /> Diversion ditches: Yes No 'kl <br />'! <br />~i7 <br />19. *Cracking or crushing of pipes <br /> Spillway pipes: Yes ® A <br /> Decant system: Yes No N~/ <br />20. Trash racks clear and in place: Ife No N/A <br />*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported t o the <br />Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse condition s <br />noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, etc .) in the <br />space on the back of this sheet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.