Laserfiche WebLink
--= <br />PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM <br />3tockponds or Sumps <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Roy Karo DATE: 3/20/2002 <br />FACILITY CONFI3URATION: Stockpond DATE LAST INSPECTION: 12/20/2001 <br />SITE NAME: T-3 LOCATION: NE'/,DTE'/„ Sec 11, T5N, R87W <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II LOCATION: 7.1 mi SE of Hayden, CO <br />MINE I.D. NO.: C-80-005 OWNER'S REP.: Gregg Kitchen Gen. Mgr. <br />Circle or write in appropriate response <br />1. Angle of slope: 4:1 upstream, 4:1 downstream Total = 8:1 N/A <br />2. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> <br />At isolated points on embankment slopes: <br />Yes ,,,{{{~~~ <br />~ <br />N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes N/A <br /> <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes T~ N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes ® N/A <br /> "Soils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes ~ N/A <br /> <br />3. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes ~ <br />r N/A <br />9. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes ~T N/A <br />5. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes ~ N/A <br />6. *Major erosion problems: Yes ~ N/A <br />7. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes ~ N/A <br />8. *Erasion of toe: Yes ~ N/A <br />9. *Water impounded against downstream toe: Yes min N/A <br />10. Existing embankment freeboard: Approximately 9.0 feet <br />11. Increase Decrease in water level: No change feet <br />12. cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes ~ N/A <br />13. Spillway erosion: Yes 1~ N/A <br />'. '1. *Clogging <br /> Spillway channels: Yes ~Np NjA <br /> Diversion ditches: Yes ii~ N/A <br />*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to <br />the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse <br />conditions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, <br />etc.) in the space on the back of this sheet. <br />5 <br />