Laserfiche WebLink
., .° _ ._ <br />,:~. <br />PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM <br />Stockponds or Sumps <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Roy Karo <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Stockpond <br />SITE NAME: T-33 <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II <br />MINE I.D. NO.: C-80-005 <br />DATE: 3/20/2002 <br />DATE LAST INSPECTION: 12/20/2001 <br />LOCATION: NE~/,NE'/„ Sec 2, TSN, R87W <br />LOCATION: 7.1 mi 5E of Hayden, CO <br />OWNER'S REP.: Gregg Kitchen <br />Circle or write in appropriate response <br />1. Angle of slope: 3:1 upstream, 4:1 downstream Total = 7:1 N/A <br />2. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes ~ N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes T~o N/A <br /> <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes T~ N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes fff~~ <br />Qdm N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes ~ N/A <br />3. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes [ <br />T~ N/A <br />4. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes N/A <br />5. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes ~o N/A <br /> ,,(( <br />6. *Major erosion problems: Yes lNA N/A <br />7. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes N/A <br />8. *Erosion of toe: Yes ~ N/A <br /> <br />9. *Water impounded against downstream toe: Yes ~ N/A <br />10. Existing embankment freeboard: Approximately 2 feet <br />11. Increase Decrease in water level: No change f <br />e <br />et <br /> ( <br />~ <br />L~ <br />12. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes N/A <br />13. Spillway erosion: Yes ~ N/A <br />14. *Clogging <br /> Spillway channels: Yes ~ N/A <br /> Diversion ditches: Yes '~O N/A <br />*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to <br />the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse <br />conditions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, <br />etc.) in the space on the back of this sheet. <br />41 <br />