Laserfiche WebLink
1 ~ ..a { <br /> <br />PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM <br />Stockponds or Sumps <br />INSPECTOR'S NAME: Roy Ka ro <br />FACILITY CONFIGURATION: Stockpond <br />SITE NAME: T-16 <br />MINE NAME: Seneca II <br />MINE I.D. NO.: C-80-005 <br />DATE: 3/20/2002 <br />DATE LAST INSPECTION: 012/20/2001 <br />LOCATION: SE'/,NW'/., Sec 12, TSN, R87W <br />LOCATION: 7.1 mi SE of Hayden, CO <br />OWNER'S REP.: Gregg Kitchen Gen. Mgr. <br />Circle or write in appropriate response <br />1. Angle of slope: 3:1 upstream, 3:1 downstream Total = 6:1 N/R <br />2. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume) <br /> At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes (~ <br />v N/A <br /> At natural hillside: Yes \ N/A <br /> Over widespread areas: Yes o N/A <br /> From downstream foundation area: Yes ~ <br />lU~l o~ N/A <br /> "Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes N/A <br />3. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes N/A <br />4. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes N/A <br />5. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes N/A <br />6. *Maj or erosion problems: Yes ~ N/A <br />7. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes ~ N/A <br />8. *Erosion of toe: Yes ~ <br />`~'~J N/A <br />9. *water impounded against downstream toe: Yes ~ N/A <br />10. Existing embankment freeboard: Approximately 7.0 feet <br />11. Increase Decrease in water level: No change feet <br />12. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes ® N/A <br />13. Spillway erosion: Yes ~ N/A <br />14. *Clogging <br /> Spillway channels: Yes ~ N/A <br /> Diversion ditches: Yes (iSO~ N/A <br />*Maj or adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to <br />the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. adverse <br />conditions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, <br />etc.) in the space on the back of this sheet. <br />21 <br />