Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • <br />999 <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl o(Nawral Resources <br />131 3 Sherman St.. Room ? 15 <br />Dcnvcr, CO 80203 <br />Phonc~ (303) ft66~3567 <br />FAY. (303) 832-8106 <br />July 14, 1993 <br />Mr. Jon C. Kubic <br />Water Quality Control Division <br />Permits and Enforcement Section <br />4300 Cherry Creek Dr. 5. <br />Denver, Co. 80222-1530 <br />RE: Permit Inactivation Request, Rockcastle Company, Grassy Gap Mine, <br />#C-81-039, NPDES permit # COG-850023 <br />Dear Mr. Kubic: <br />of cow <br />tip= <br />~e \ <br />~ r8 T6 ~ <br />Ray Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />Recently, a request was made by Rockcastle Coal Company to inactivate the CDPS <br />permit for the Grassy Creek (Gap) Mine. Based on your response dated May 13, <br />1993, this request was denied until such time as the Colorado Division of <br />Minerals & Geology (CDMG) is fully satisfied that the site has been adequately <br />reclaimed. It is the opinion of CDMG that this site, in its present state, <br />has been returned to an adequately stable condition. <br />All point source discharge locations, with the exceptions of 001 and 005, have <br />been eliminated by reclamation of sediment ponds, and demonstration as <br />required by the Rules and Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board for Coal Mining. Specifically, Rule 4.05. 2 (2) requires that sediment <br />ponds be retained until the affected area ceases to contribute additional <br />suspended solids above the premining condition, and the effluent meets State <br />and Federal water quality standards. The operator adequately demonstrated <br />compliance with this Rule for all point source locations except 001 and 005, <br />and with the exceptions of points 001 and 005, the points have been removed. <br />Location 001 is Pond 4 (Pit 4), which discharges to Grassy Creek. This pond <br />has been approved as a permanent impoundment per Rule 4.05.9(1), and it is <br />intended for use as a livestock water source. Rule 4.05.9(1)(a> requires the <br />effluent from such impoundments must meet applicable State and Federal water <br />quality standards. A check of the discharge record for Pond 4 indicates no <br />discharge during its history. Based on the revegetation over 957, of the <br />watershed and the observations of little or no water in the pond during the <br />heavy runoff season of 1993, its our opinion this impoundment will not <br />discharge to Grassy Creek. In the event that it did, it is designed to <br />control settleable solids within appropriate limits. <br />