My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO23780
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO23780
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:44:08 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:04:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
6/28/1999
Doc Name
VIC INFO
From
GLEN A MILLER
To
US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'~ ~ r III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~ <br />y ::. 999 <br />gun z a i~y9 <br />GLEN A. MILLER <br />2264 Willow Wood Road <br />Grand Junction, CO 81503 <br />~o~. N~.t~e: v r C xw~~ . <br />June 24, ] 999 <br />Mr. Dan Jackson <br />U. S. Environmental Protection Agency <br />999 I8'h Street, Suite 500 <br />Denver, CO 80202-2466 <br />}tE: Draft Statement of Basis, <br />Yankee Gulch Project <br />Class Ill Solution Mining Wells <br />Dear Mr. Jackson: <br />This comment letter was delayed by a mis-mailing of the Draft, I received it yesterday <br />hope my wririen comments will be useful, I'll not be able to attend the July 13'" heazing. <br />My technical and scientific background: I retired from the U.S. Geological Survey after 35 <br />years, 30 of which I worked on groundwater projects, including 10 years as staff hydrologist with <br />the US DOI Oil Shale office, which administered the Prototype Leasing Program of the 1970's-80's. <br />My work there involved detailed hydrologic and water quality effects ofvarious oil shale and sodium <br />extraction plans in the Piceance Basin. <br />From my brief review of the Draft, and past review/comment on the BLM EIS for this <br />Project, there is a maior concern related to the probable movement of brine from the proposed mine <br />cavities into the Parachute Creek Aquifer, caused by caving and subsidence, and then into Piceance <br />Creek. As noted below and in the attached EIS comment letter, this movement is likely to occur <br />during project operations, and almost certain to occur post-project. Neither the EIS nor the EPA <br />Draft Permit address the necessity for adequate monitoring for early detection of brine movement, <br />so that timely prevention remediation measures can be taken. <br />Specific Comments on The Draft <br />1. P. 2, last Paz. The statement that no "void" will be produced is not likely to be correct. A <br />600' x 200' cylinder of rich oil shale, when depleted of solid saline minerals <br />by solution mining, will be an extremely weak rock unit. The 200-foot span <br />of the "roof' or sill pillaz will not support itself, Dissolved saline beds, some <br />more than ]0' thick, will certainly leave voids, which will lead to rapid <br />caving, and probably will adversely effect pillars. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.