Laserfiche WebLink
Near Syracuse, the Solvay Process Company began using brine as a raw material in its soda ash <br />manufacturing plant in~4 (Luther, 1896). The company dri~1 a series of exploratory µ•ells south <br />of Syracuse, ultimately covering rock salt in Tully Valley in 888 at a depth of 1,216 feet (Luther, <br />1896; Phalen, 1923). Thus began the hundred-year operational history of New York's largest solution <br />mining field, with respect to both number of wells drilled and volume of salt v.•ithdrawm. Brine produced <br />at Tully Valley was transported to the soda ash plant near Syracuse via a 20-mile long gravity pipeline. <br />The fifteen years following the drilling of the Pioneer well were hectic ones for Ne~v York's <br />solution mining industry. By 1893, the year lVemer (1917) declared the peak of the early solution <br />mining industry in the state, 24 evaporation plants were in operation using 75 wells. Excluding Tully <br />Valley, solution mining wells were located in R'yoming, Livingston, Genesee and Tompkins Counties <br />in 1893 (Merrill, 1893). Brine fields were small, averaging about three wells each. <br />Wemer (1917) states that after 1593, overproduction resulted in industry reorganization and <br />consolidation. Many of the early plants were acquired and closed by the International Salt Company <br />shonly after the turn of the century. <br />Table 3 summarizes al] solution mining facilities known to have existed in Neu• York since 1 STS. <br />Table 3. Solution salt minine in New York. IS7S-199> <br />County Number of <br />active fields Number of <br />abandoned <br />fields Number oflmownsolution <br />mining wells drilled Yearfint <br />sell drilled Year last <br />field <br />abandoned <br />Genesee 0 2 11 1878 after 1917 <br />Livingston 0 9 25 1883 after 1917 <br />Onondaga 0 I 162 1888 1988 <br />Ontario 0 I 1 1384 un}:nown <br />Schuyler 2 ! 88 IS93 -- <br />Tompkins 0 3 27 189] 1952 <br />lL'yoming 3 24 ??7 1878 -- <br />TOTAL, 5 41 551 <br />Merrill (1893) and others describe the cavern development methods used zt the small ~\`}•oming <br />and Livingston County brine fields during the £rst few }•ears of New York's solution mining industry. <br />Single well caverns were common, with fresh water introduced through the annulus and brine ~vithdraw•n <br />by pumping through the tubing (see Figure 2). R'here water-bearing formations were present above the <br />salt, operators typically allowed water to flow from these formations down through the annulus to contact <br />and dissolve salt. `,Then a sufficient water source «as not zvailable do«•nhole, operators pumped water <br />from nearby creeks or springs do«n the annulus to force brine up through the tubing. When eavems at <br />multi-well fields became interconnected, operators began using separate wells for injection and <br />withdra~ti•al. The Division of 1`4ineral Resources is not a«•are of subsidence damage, sinkholes, or <br />5 <br />?~~ <br /> <br />