My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-03-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
1999-03-15_PERMIT FILE - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2021 2:16:26 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/15/1999
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology Report
Annual Report Year
1998
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 1998 Report Section 2.5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• those in downgradient well GF-4. A very gradual increase in sulfate concentration in <br /> downgradient well GF-4 had been observed over the last few years. This small increase is <br /> well within the natural variation of sulfate concentrations in the HI aquifer but could be due <br /> to the effects of the backfill aquifer upgradient. Sulfate concentrations in backfill well GF-7 <br /> significantly decreased during the period of 1995 through 1997 but increased in 1998. The <br /> water level in 1998 was fairly similar to the previous few years level in well GF-7, indicating <br /> that the increase was not due to new backfill being saturated. Sulfate concentrations in <br /> well GMP-1 have been gradually increasing with time, with a few much higher values every <br /> year or so, including the two 1998 values. The water level in well GMP-1 has been steadily <br /> increasing for seven years, which is likely due to increase in water levels in the bacldhll <br /> aquifer to the south of this well. The increase in sulfates may be due to new saturation of <br /> • back ill material. The sulfate concentrations in wells GP-3 and GP-7 show some variation <br /> over the last few years but do not show a significant trend. Sulfate concentrations in <br /> eastern HI aquifer well GC-1 have been similar to the higher values in well GMP-1 and are <br /> natural. Therefore, a sulfate concentration of at least greater than 600 mg/I is needed to <br /> be confident that the increases are due to the mining operation. <br /> Figure B-16 presents the sulfate concentrations for five 3rd White Sandstone wells. <br /> A gradual declining trend in 3rd White Sandstone well GB-2 had been occurring over the <br /> last few years but the 1998 value indicates an increasing trend. The sulfate concentrations <br /> in well 81-03A are similar to sulfate concentrations in other 3rd White Sandstone wells. <br /> The last three years of well P-8 sulfate values have significantly increased. The magnitude <br /> and timing of the sulfate concentrations in well P-8 indicate that this increase is due to <br /> mining. Figure B-17 presents the sulfate concentrations for wells GE-3, GLUX-1 and P-5. <br /> 3-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.