My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO23596
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO23596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:44:03 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:56:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
2/16/1978
Doc Name
MEMO COTTER CORP SCHWARTZWALDER MINE JEFFERSON CNTY APPLICATION FOR MINING & RECLAMATION PERMIT
From
DWR
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
any 5-day period would be combined into <br />"composite" samples for analysis. Three <br />such 5-day periods would be monitored by <br />the permittee each month. The concentra- <br />tions measured in the 3 composite samples <br />would be averaged to determine compliance <br />with the 30-day average limitation. In <br />addition, one grab sample would be taken <br />during each 5-day period and analyzed to <br />determine compliance with the daily <br />maximum limitation. <br />In addition to changing the sampling frequency and adopting <br />a composite approach to reduce the number of lab procecures re- <br />quired, the language of the permit under section A.4. should be <br />changed to make clear that data submitted by the permit:tee will <br />be used to determine compliance, and not merely as an "indication <br />of probable compliance or noncompliance...." <br />II. blonitoring Points other than Outfall 001. <br />Since the Q7-10 for Ralston Creek is zero, the entire discharge <br />from the Cotter mining operation must not cause the stream standard <br />to be exceeded. Therefore it is not enough to monitor only the <br />discharge from the sedimentation ponds. Since the Division has <br />adopted an effluent limitation which allows the equiva]_ent <br />of the entire stream standard to be discharged from the: sedimen- <br />tation ponds, then there must be no discharge of the regulated <br />pollutants from any other point of the mining operation. <br />For this reason, EDF believes that the Division is fully justi- <br />fied in requiring control plans to prevent surface watEar runoff from <br />the ore piles and ore sorter areas from reaching the si:ream, and to <br />require isolation of the waste rock disposal area from the stream. <br />But in order to ensure that no additional pollutants are dis- <br />charged from any of these points or from seepage throu~.~h unlined <br />ponds or inadequately maintained berms, EUF requests that ground- <br />water and in-stream monitoring be added to the permit. Groundwater <br />monitoring can be much less frequent than effluent dis~~harge moni- <br />toring, and we would leave the frequency to the discre~=ion of the <br />Division. In-stream monitoring should be tailored to :Ldentify <br />pollutants carried into the stream by surface water ru~iof_f, and <br />should therefore be triggered by precipitation events. The <br />number of events to be sampled could be limited by sea:~on and <br />other factors, but the sampling program would have to lie care- <br />fully defined to measure contributions of pollutants from the <br />mining operation which were not discharged from the sedimentation <br />ponds. <br />III. Analytical Methods <br />Samples should be analyzed using standard procedures approved <br />- 5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.