Laserfiche WebLink
-13- <br />• <br />Area II <br />Foundation conditions in Area II were evaluated by drilling bor- <br />ing No. 9 through 14. Foundation conditions encountered in these <br />borings consisted of a very thin layer of very stiff clays over medium <br />hard to hard claystone. The layer of clay ranged in thickness from 2 <br />to about 5 feet. Claystones underneath the surficial layer were medium <br />hard near the ground surface and became very hard at depths on the <br />order of 10 to 15 feet. Unconfined compressive strengths in the under- <br />lying materials ranged from 10,000 psf to nearly 22,000 psf. These <br />unconfined compression tests are on samples obtained with a Calif- <br />ornia drive type sampler. Samples were relatively undisturbed, <br />however, our experience indicates that if core type samples are ob- <br />• tained, the unconfined compressive strengths may even be higher than <br />those indicated by these values. Penetration resistance tests were <br />made at about 5-foot intervals in the borings in an attempt to <br />confirm the results of the unconfined compression tests. <br />In our opinion, the conditions that will exist in the bottom <br />of the valley at disposal Area No. II will be very similar to the <br />conditions encountered in disposal Area No. I and at the sedimen- <br />tation damsite. We anticipate foundation conditions in this area <br />to consist of a layer of softer clays ranging in thickness from 5 <br />to 10 feet over the relatively unweathered clay stones. The hard <br />clays and clay shales encountered on the higher dry slopes of the <br />valley in disposal Area No. II have been pre-consolidated to high <br />pressures and will compress slightly under the loads anticipated. <br />• For purposes of stability analysis, we used C = 1,000 psf and <br />