My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE53532
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE53532
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:56 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:48:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2006034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/31/2006
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
Glacier Peak Mining LLC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As shown on the maps, the dig sites are generally located on the hill tops and not in the <br />drainage areas. None are located on slopes greater than 30 percent. Where the actual <br />excavations reach into the gullies, I will leave a strip of undisturbed ground if at ail <br />possible (Some pre-existing disturbances do not have this buffer wne). <br />All excavations wilt be termed and silt fences will be used in the berms. The Forest <br />Service now requires this on areas of 10 percent or greater slope. Before an excavation is <br />begun, I cut a berm along the downslope edge along the entire length of the proposed <br />excavation using the track hoe bucket. A silt fence is then erected inside the berm and its <br />apron is weighted down. Rocks and possible sedimem are caught either by the berm or <br />the silt fence. <br />Some dead timber from the Hayman fire will also be laid cross slope to help stabilize and <br />reduce any possible runoff. <br />All berms and silt fences will remain in place for at least a year after reclamation. (The <br />Forest Service now requires them to remain in place until 80 percent growth is achieved.) <br />Stormwater that leaves the sites is limited to that which is running off ground other than <br />the excavation sites. I have not tried to mitigate any increased runoff caused by the <br />Hayman fire except as it might have an impact on the mining sites by increasing the <br />runoff received by them. At this point, I don't believe any of the sites will be affected; <br />however, if necessary, I will cut berms above these sites and use silt fencing to protect the <br />mining site. <br />I am operating with this standard: Zero tolerance. No runoff with sediments will leave <br />any of the permitted sites. I am and will take measures to insure this is achieved. <br />Rule 6.3.4 Exhibit D-Reclamation Plan <br />Reclamation Costs: Please comment on why the cost estimate for the reclamation is <br />based on only a partial reclamation (I2, 000 sq ft excavation, and two prospect pits). <br />Note that the Operator will be required to bond for the reclamation of the entire <br />disturbance (Rule 4.2.2(2)). <br />As stated, the reclamation costs were based on the areas anticipated to be disturbed in any <br />one season and not yet reclaimed. The annual disturbance, not reclaimed in the same <br />season, should average about 16,000 square feet (approximately I/3 acre.) <br />I am now aware the Division of Minerals and Geology computes the bond, not on what is <br />actually disturbed in any season and what would be required to be reclaimed, but on what <br />is planned to be disturbed for the life ofthe operation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.