My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE53380
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE53380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:45:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/3/2002
Doc Name
Certification of Report Phase IV
From
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2002 -6- 003-2203 <br />shaft remediation. A mix design was proposed by Ames using Type I/II <br />cement. The concrete supplier, Transit Mix of Colorado Springs, <br />Colorado, furnished sulfate resistance testing data for Holnam Type UII <br />cement, which demonstrated the proposed cement met the sulfate resistant <br />requirement of ASTM C1S0-97A for Type V cement. Therefore, Golder <br />approved the use of Holnam Type UII cement in the mix design. <br />- February 2002: Golder recommended remediation of UG-545 (Squaw <br />Mountain Tunnel) by backfilling the mined void with a flowable, <br />cement-based fill. <br />- February 2002: Golder approved a modification to the Phase IV Diversion <br />Channel wing-wall alignment. The wing-wall alignment was modified to <br />tie the wall directly into competent bedrock, thus forming one side of the <br />wall with bedrock. <br />- April 2002: Golder approved removal of the solution collection piping <br />within the Phase IVa Area. The piping was deemed unnecessary for <br />solution recovery by CC&V. Golder determined no impact to the design <br />by removal of these pipes. <br />- April 2002: Golder accepted a variance in the Fine Shaft Backfill (FSB) <br />gradation for the specific quantity of material tested. The variance in the <br />FSB gradation was considered insignificant by Golder based on experience <br />with similaz projects. <br />- July 2002: Golder approved a modification to the three 42-inch CSP for <br />the Phase IVa Haul Road crossing. Golder extended the three 42-inch <br />CSP approximately 2S feet to accommodate additional cover material on <br />the south end. <br />1.5 Record Survey Documentation <br />Ames Construction of Aurora, Colorado provided the Record Drawings for the activities <br />associated with the Phase IVa Area. A Colorado Registered Land Surveyor prepared the <br />drawings. The Record Drawings are presented in Appendix A. The Surveyor's certificates aze <br />presented in Appendix F. Ames also provided the geomembrane panel locations and <br />destructive test locations used by Golder to develop the geomembrane panel layout drawing. <br /> <br />I\W\2203\04(q\CmRep08 021003 2203 060p.06]GOgt.doc Csoldei' Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.