Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Ed Baker <br />May 1, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br />The fast grout stage was placed through the bottom of the PVC pipe. The AQ rods were <br />then decoupled from the PVC pipe and the remaining grout was placed from the AQ rod. The <br />drillers reported that as the AQ rod was decoupled from the PVC pipe, and was being raised to <br />the next grout level, the AQ rod became detached from the wireline and dropped uncontrolled for <br />about 20 ft. The AQ wireline rod became plugged with grout at about 1480 ft bgs and required <br />removal and cleaning. Therefore, re-insertion of the AQ rod into the drill hole was unavoidable. <br />The driller also reported that the AQ rod caught on the cable at approximately 1390 ft bgs. The <br />borehole was eventually grouted to within about 6 ft from surface. The casing was filled from <br />about 6 ft bgs to about 2 ft bgs with clean rounded gravel. Eventually the installation will be <br />completed and protected by covering with a plastic enclosure. <br />Morrrroxnvc <br />The TDR cable ends that went downhole were fitted with high-pressure stainless steel <br />end caps having two 2000-psi O-rings. Prior to grouting, water pressures acting on the cables <br />did not exceed 700 psi based on the water level in the well. The TDR cables were monitored on <br />their spools after the end caps were in position. Those data aze, as expected, showing cable ends <br />indicated at appropriate depths by a strong inflection to more positive reflection coefficients. The <br />four TDR cables were monitored again after the base of the TDR string was at the appropriate <br />total depth (1823 ft bgs). Those data were not completely valid due to problems with the cable <br />connectors. Once the connector problem was remedied, the four cables were monitored, with the <br />fast lift (180 ft) of grout placed. These readings are designated `ire-grout," although there was <br />in fact a small lift of grout in place. The pre-grout readings aze presented along with the baseline <br />readings on Figures 2 through 5. The pre-grout readings show strong cable end reflections that <br />aze positive due to an open circuit at the cable ends. The crimps did not show up as well as <br />expected on the pre-grout readings. It appears that the connector problem might have <br />contributed enough attenuation to mask the crimps. However, there is yet the possibility that the <br />crimps may be better revealed with further data processing. <br />Baseline readings were collected on the Monday (4/21/03). These readings revealed that <br />between the time the first lift of grout was placed and the following day, three of the four cables <br />had been compromised. The baseline data from TDR3 showed that the cable was intact with <br />strong cable end and crimp reflections. TDRl, TDR3, and TDR4 showed strong negative <br />reflections that aze indicative of a closed circuit. The closed circuit, and the geometry of these <br />reflections, suggests that water has infiltrated the dielectrics of the three compromised cables. <br />However, Agapito Associates, Inc. is continuing to analyze the data, and no conclusions <br />regazding the cause of cable failure have been established. <br />Subsequent TDR readings (4/25 and 4/29) on the four cables suggest that the reflection <br />signals for all four cables have not changed significantly since the baseline reading. However, <br />these data have not been post-processed. <br />