PERMFILE53086

• Permit No: M2000039
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 3/31/2000
• Doc Name: MCKENNA LIMESTONE QUARRY FN M-2000-039 RESULTS OF ADEQUACY REVIEW OF 110C PERMIT APPLICATION
• From: DMG
• To: DEHUR INDUSTRIES INC
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII •
999
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman 51., Room ?15
Denver, Colorado 80'_03
Phone: [phone]
FAx: (303) 83?-8106
•
STATE OF COLORADO
FOR YOUR CORRESPONDENCE FILE
March 31.2000
Mr. Rick Hur+vorth
Delhur Industries, Inc.
P.O. Box 883
Hermiston, OR 97838
RE: McKenna Limestone Quarry (File M-2000-039) Results of adequacy revie+v of 1 I Oc permit application
Dear Mr.Hunvorth:
The Division has revie+ved your permit application for the McKenna Limestone Quarry'. The application is
extremely well attd neatly done. The Division, ho+vever, has identified certain adequacy concerns as follows;
DIVISION OF
MINERALS
GEOLOGY
RECLAMATION
MINING•SAFETY
B~II Owens
covernnr
GregE Watcher
Executive Dve[IOr
Michael B. Long
Division Director
BASIC REQUIREMENTS: The application is not accompanied by a Performance Wartann and, for the
moment, lacks a Financial Warrant}' in an amount and form acceptable to the Division.
A,,,n''~1~ "4'~ A Performance Warranty form will be sent ++ith [his review and should be returned +vith a notarized
~~„Ik+" J~ signature. Since the Division does accept your estimate of the cost of reclamation, i.e. S 17,100.00, please indicate
NN"''''"" '"~~ the type of Financial Warranty you +vish to use in supplying the Warranty and the Division will send you the proper
b~~,+''~-{~- form(s). (See Rule 4.3 for the acceptable types of Financial Warranties.)
y,4 ~~ T10TICES: The Division is aware that you intended the public notice, required by Rule 1.6.2 (d), to be
{'s published on 3/16/00. Evidence, however, has not yet been received that this .vas done. There is also no evidence in
the permit package [ha[ the o+vner of record of the surface and mineral rights to the land to be affected by the
mining operation or of surface lands ++ithin 200 feet of the boundary of the land to be affected have been notified
as required by Rules 1.6.2 (e) (i) and (ii).
Please provide evidence of notifying Mr. McKenna, who is identified as the surface and subsurface owner
,,,t~j~of the land to be affected by the operation, and So. Gas, Inc., +ahich your maps sho+v as being an owner of property
W' ~~(s°~', located 190 feet east of the east boundan' of the proposed permit/affected area.
e~i,,tt'^ ~ EXHIBIT B-SITE DESCRIPTION (Rule 6.3.2 (b)): four Exhibit B narrati+•e indicates there are no malt
U made structures within 200 (ez[ of your proposed quarry. Fences qualifi~ as permanent man-made structures and it
a- Itas been thz Division's experience that these are often overlooked in the preparation of an application.
Please confirm that there is no fence alone the County Road'_11 right-of-way thru which your new
access/haul road must pass in order to connect +vish the counn- road. Please confirm that there is no fence along the
p'F~~~~y,~ boundaq• of the Econ Liquors, Inc. propzm' and that of So. Gas, Ind. which your maps indicate is located 190 fzet
..,rP" ~"~ east of the zastzrn boundary of your proposed perntit area. In the event one or both such fences are present, please
~oA~ provide a revised Exhibit B which acknowledges this and includes the identity of the owner(s) of such structure(sj.
~~~~
~~