My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52991
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:34 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:33:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981026
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES INFORMATION
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX B
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i• <br />Abstract <br />7n tip and August 1980, and January 1981, Gordon & Kranzush, <br />Inc. conducted an intensive cultural resources inventory of approxi- <br />mately 350 acres of coal exploration and lease areas in Jackson <br />County, Colorado which are now contained within the proposed Canadian <br />Strip 24ine Extension Permit Boundaries. The work was performed at <br />the request of Wyoming Fuel Compares. Two historic localities (5 Ja1,86 <br />and 4$8) and five aboriginal isolated finds (5 ,]x378, 380r 381, 459, <br />and L,87 were recorded, and a previously recorded site (5 JA163) was <br />briefly visited by G&IC. None of the resources recorded by G&R are <br />deemed eligible for National Register of Historic Places nomination. <br />and though three of the isolated finds lie within areas slated for <br />direct impact from mine pit construction, this impact - and arm in- <br />direct impacts threatened from blasting or disturbance - are not <br />considered to be adverse. There appears to be contradictory data on <br />file regarding the results of reconiation and significance assess- <br />ment for the previously recorded 5 JA163, and GddS recommends a com- <br />plete reinvestigation of the site surface to determine the necessity <br />far further mitigation of the possible indirect impacts threatened <br />by increased activity in the site area and blasting nearby. No <br />tlu~ther work is recocmmended for the historic localities or aboriginal <br />isolated finds. <br />C~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.