Laserfiche WebLink
rage <br /> <br />Cooley, Ed <br />From: Akin, Celina <br />Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 4:50 PM <br />To: Cooley, Ed <br />Subject: FW: Well 20-12 elevation comparison <br />From: Nathan Bell [mailto:nbell@gambaengineering.com] <br />Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 4:41 PM <br />To: Akin, Celina <br />Subject: Well 20-12 elevation comparison <br />Celina, <br />Attached is an Excel sheet showing the three general areas around the regraded well pad that were used for our <br />calculations. As you can see, some of the speck shots were outside of the t-ft criteria but this is to be expected <br />due to vegetation and small localized variances between the aerial and the more precise ground survey. The <br />averages for each general area more accurately present the picture of what is going on or not going on in this <br />case around Well 20-12. <br />Let me know if you need anything else. <br />Nathan Bell, P.E. <br />Gamba & Associates, Inc. <br />P.O. Box 1458 <br />Glenwood Springs,GO 81602 <br />Phane:(970)945-2550 <br />Fax: (970) 945-1410 <br />www gambaengineeri~.com <br />E-mail: nbellC~gambaengineering.com <br />4/13/2005 <br />