My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO23094
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO23094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:43:45 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:31:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
11/26/1991
Doc Name
QUARTERLY SEDIMENT POND INSPECTION AND WATER QUALITY MONITORI
From
ACZ
To
MLRD
Permit Index Doc Type
SEDIMENT POND INSPECTIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Rockcastle Company <br />Grassy Gap Mine <br />Sediment Pond Inspection <br />October, 1991 <br />In accordance with the existing mining permit for The Rockcastle Company's <br />(ROCKCASTLE) Grassy Gap Mine in Routt County Colorado, an inspection of the <br />sediment retention ponds was performed on October 1, 1991. The inspection was <br />completed by Robert Peterson, ACZ Inc. Engineer in behalf of ROCKCASTLE. <br />The existing 4 ponds were inspected for structural problems related to the <br />embankment and the facilities, evidence of erosion, and other hazardous <br />conditions. The inspection included a survey of the sediment levels in Pond 5/6 <br />using a hand level and a survey rod. <br />Following are the results of the October, 1991 sediment pond inspections. <br />POND 2 <br />The incised pond west of the reclaimed Pit 2 contained no measurable water, <br />however the bottom was slightly moist and cattails were present. The trapezoidal <br />riprapped outlet channel showed no signs of recent discharge and appeared to <br />be intact and functioning properly. <br />Due to the steep sideslopes, vegetation was limited to mostly native grasses and <br />few low shrubs on the embankment crest. It was noted that the southeast facing <br />slope had very dry and loose soils. Several burrows and animal travel paths down <br />into the pond were noted causing some erosion of the steeply sloping <br />embankment side. There were not gullies, cracks, slides, or seepage was <br />observed on the embankment sideslopes. <br />The sediment level in the pond was not measured during this inspection. Due to <br />the small amount of precipitation for the area during the summer months and <br />evidence of minimal inflow as observed on a monthly basis, the sediment level has <br />not changed significantly from that measured in June, 1991, approximately 10 feet <br />below the invert of the spillway. The accumulated sediment is considered to be <br />negligible compared to the storage capacity of the pond. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.