Laserfiche WebLink
r ~ Y <br />-: <br />• --' (," <br />I <br />Conclusions and Recomnendatio`ns <br />~' Existing water resources within the leasehold and imnediafe vicinity <br />tha`i'will be affected by mining are subsurface waters contained in the <br />target coal seam, the Laramie formation overburden, and the blow sand <br />and stream deposits associated with abroad flat depression known as <br />Ennis Draw. The Larimie-Foxhills formation, the most important aquifer <br />in the area, is more than 200 ft below the coal seam proposed to be mined. <br />No effects of mining on the Laramie-Foxhills aquifer are anticipated. <br />Surface runoff in the area is essentially non-existent under present <br />conditions. This is not expected to change provided that three or more <br />feet of the existing blow sand are placed aver the spoil in the reclam- <br />ati.on phase. <br />• The target coal seam and the Laramie overburden are hydraulically <br />independent aquifers. The coal.seam is a confined aquifer but waters in <br />the overburden are only locally confined. Flow of ground water through <br />the coal seam is negligible as the transmissivity of this aquifer is <br />extremely small. Groundwater flow iq the overburden is toward the north- <br />east. Approximately 5.4 acre-ft of groundwater per year are discharged <br />from the leasehold area. This flow apparently enters the blow sand and <br />stream deposits associated with Ennis Draw. The source of this flow is <br />external to the study area and enters the project area by lateral flow. <br />Recharge of the overburden aquifer in the study area is believed to be <br />essentially zero. <br />The water in the overburden aquifer is of poor quality, the dissolved <br />solids concentration exceeding 7000 mg/1 with a sodium-adsorption-ratio <br />greater than 10, Probably the only viable .u se of the water in the over- <br />burden is for dust control or similar purpose. Waters contained in the <br />.~ <br /> <br />