My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52847
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52847
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:29 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:28:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
GROUND-WATER RESOURCES STUDY
Section_Exhibit Name
ASH DISPOSAL PLANS APPENDIX A
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
42 <br />of mining and includes inflow from the trench in Pits A and B. • <br />The rates and volumes of inflow shown in Figure 17 are probably the <br />maximums that can be anticipated. As explained previously, the values of <br />transmissivity obtained from the aquifer tests are believed to be greater <br />than the actual values because they reflect the influence of well-bore <br />storage not accounted for in the analysis procedure. Should the actual <br />mean transmissivity be less than the value of 10 ft2/day used in the <br />computations, inflow will be correspondingly less. It may also be that <br />the actual rate of extension of trench length will be less than the value <br />of 50 ft/day used in the computations; if so, the inflow peaks will be <br />less than presented herein. Finally, the computation procedure ignores <br />that, during the period in which the length of open trench is increasing, <br />new increments are being advanced into overburden that has been partially ~. <br />drained by previous segments. This also will cause the inflow to be less <br />than estimated. <br />It should be recognized that the inflow to the trench will be dis- <br />tributed all along the trench in the form of seeps at various points on <br />the high wall and zmanatin9 from beneath the spoil. The distributed <br />nature of the inflow will tend to maximize evaporation and it is highly <br />unlikely that inflow will become sufficiently concentrated in the trench <br />to flow as a stream and require removal. <br />It was mentioned previously that a portion of the area designated <br />as Pit A in Figure 16 intersects the area, beneath which, stream deposits <br />associated with the aid Ennis Draw exist. Inflow to the east end of the <br />trench could be substantial from these deposits should they be intersected, <br />and it is recommended that special ca re. be taken to prevent significant _ <br />• . <br />disturbance of the waters jn Ennis Draw. The proposals, advanced by Coors, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.