My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52799
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52799
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:27 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:27:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/15/2002
Doc Name
1995 Baseline Vegetation Report, December 1995
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume III Exhibit 05 Vegetation Data
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• (Galium spurium) was the dominant annual forb rather than Allysum minus. Transects <br />averaged 7.8 species sampled. <br />Six perennial species contributed greater than 3% cover in the reference area. <br />Four were similarly common in the baseline community (snowbeny, Gambel oak, <br />juniper, and locoweed). The other two (mule's ear and perennial pepperweed <br />(Lepidium montanum)) were present in baseline data as well, but at levels less than 3%. <br />Two annuals had relative cover values exceeding 3%. <br />Production (JR+ref): (Tables A12, B7) Total perennial, non-noxious <br />production was estimated at 304 pounds per acre. This value is statistically higher than <br />the baseline area value (Table B11). The calculated t value was higher than the table <br />value. Thus, the null hypothesis of equality was rejected. However, because the <br />• reference area production was higher and yet still fairly nominal, it was felt that the <br />reference area would he acceptable to both the Division and the operator in spite of the <br />difference. If another reference area could have been found that would have given a <br />better match, it would have been sampled. However, such an area was not found. <br />Woody stem density (JWref): (Tables A17, B8) Woody stem densities were <br />estimated as being more than 1600 stems per acre less than in the baseline area. This <br />difference is somewhat cryptic, due mainly to the lack of holly-grape (Mahonia repens) <br />individuals in the reference area. Though strictly defined as a shrub, this species is <br />very low to the ground and acts more like a forb or subshrub. Visually, its absence is <br />not immediately noticeable. All other shrub species bad comparable densities in the <br />baseline and reference areas. <br />• <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.