My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52799
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52799
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:27 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:27:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/15/2002
Doc Name
1995 Baseline Vegetation Report, December 1995
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume III Exhibit 05 Vegetation Data
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Production (JW): (Tables A11, B7) Total hert~aceous production averaged <br />36.4 grams for the one meter squared plow, which translates to 325 pounds/acre. Only <br />570 of the total production was from perennial grasses and fortis. 185 pounds/acre of <br />perennial, non-noxious production was estimated for the baseline community. <br />Woody stem density (JW): (Tables A16, B8) Total stem density was <br />estimated at approximately 4500 stem/acre. Holly-grape (Mahonia repens) and <br />snowberry were the most numerous species. <br />*** JW Reference area *** <br />General Information (JWref): Because the Juniper Woodland baseline area <br />was more gently sloped than JW areas immediately east and west, matching it to a <br />• reference area was initially difficult (this was the third area that was sampled). In spite <br />of the difficulties, a suitable reference area was located. It consisted of two unequal <br />sized pieces that were separated by a mixed shrub dominated ravine. Initially, it was <br />hoped that the larger west section would suffice by itself. However, although it was <br />statistically similar to the baseline area in terms of total absolute vegetative cover (and <br />total production), it had a high annual component and was too low to match on the <br />basis of perennial, non-noxious cover. The area across (northeast) the ravine appeared <br />to have a higher cover. This area was avoided intitially because it was closer to the <br />proposed disturbed area and it was believed to have higher cover and production <br />values, voiding the possibility of matching it to the baseline area. Combining the two <br />sections worked well. Samples were spread randomly throughout the two areas but <br />were not intended to be proportional to their actual acreage. Future sampling should <br />• <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.