My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52799
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52799
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:27 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:27:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/15/2002
Doc Name
1995 Baseline Vegetation Report, December 1995
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume III Exhibit 05 Vegetation Data
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• success in reclaimed areas and do not apply toward standards based on reference areas. <br />These species are most important regarding success in the Disturbed Meadow and <br />Juniper Woodland communities and least important regarding the Mixed Shrub <br />community. <br />I. Juniper Woodland Community <br />*** JW Baseline Area *** <br />General Information (JW): Twenty-four cover transects were necessary [o <br />achieve adequacy because of the fairly wide range in the first hit cover data. Individual <br />transects ranged from 24% to 64% total vegetative cover. Higher amounts of variation <br />could be expected because the shrub understory species were not consistently present <br />throughout the community. In general, understory shrub species were more prevalent <br />• at higher altitudes where the vegetation transitioned into the mixed shrub community. <br />The lower portions of the community tended to be drier, had less of a shrub <br />understory, and had a higher annual forb component. <br />Table B9 shows that the twenty-four cover samples exceeded the sample <br />adequacy calculation of 18.5 (Table B9; based on total absolute cover), indicating that <br />an adequate cover sample was collected for the baseline area. The twenty-four cover <br />locations were also sampled for woody stem density. The maximum 50 production <br />plots were sampled. <br />Absolute cover (JW): (Tables A1, B1) Total vegetative cover was estimated <br />to be 46.0%, though the more important value, perennial, non-noxious vegetative <br />cover, upon which present and future comparisons are based, was 38.3%. Annual <br />• <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.