Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />A sketch of a Cement Bond tool is portrayed on the left side of Fig. 16. The signal indicated <br />in "A" is that of free pipe with the total [ravel rime for five and one-half-inch casing and showing <br />the width and posi[ion of the electronic gate. "B" is a signal where formation transit time greater <br />than pipe time is experienced. The casing to cement and cement to formation bond is good quality <br />resulting in the signal taking on the transit time of the formation. 'C" represents a signal where <br />formation transit lime is less than pipe. The resultant is a transit time slightly lower than pipe <br />with low amplitude. "D" indicates [he signal resulting from formation transi[ time considerably <br />less than pipe. The resultant is a transit time much lower [han pipe time and the amplitude of the <br />sinusoidal wave coming under the electronic gate indicates high amplitude. Here, there at first <br />appears to be conflicting information for the interpretation of the Cement Bond log. Experience, <br />however, has shown chat a good cement bond does exist when these conditions are indicated by the <br />log. <br />PIPE BONDED <br />TO IgLMA710N TILWSn 71ME (MICROSECONDS) <br />i <br />F',ure to <br />O <br />O <br />O <br />An example of a Gamma Ray-Neutron and Cement Bond Log are presen[ed in Fig. 17. Curve <br />N 1 is a Gamma Ray, A 2 a Casing Collar Locator, and =.' 3 a Neutron tog. Curve N 4 is the Transi[ <br />Time Curve in microseconds per foot. The dotted line is transit time for ten and three-fourth- <br />inch casing. In the poor bond section the recorded transit time is very close to pipe time. The <br />casing collars are apparent in the poor bond section. Curve a 5 represents [he amplitude recorded <br />under the electronic gate. Note the casing collars indicated at 2, 074, 2, 115, and 2, 134 feet in the <br />poor bond section. <br />One of the logs used in the oil and gas industry that has not, up to this time, been used in the <br />solution brine well industry is the Salinometer Log. The log shows a continuous recording of the <br />mud resistivity in the well bore. Measurements are made on the inside of the tool where only the <br />mud resistivity can influence the reading of [he four electrodes. The product is the mud resistiv- <br />ity in values of ohms per me[er cubed. <br />An example of the use of the Salinometer Log is shown in Fig. 18. These logs were taken <br />for the Atomic Energy Commission under field supervision of Fenix & Scisson at the request of <br />United States Geological Survey for use in geological and hydrological interpretation as part of <br />i '~~ <br />_ 'o ;- <br />"- : ;. . <br />- tl' <br />~e 1 <br />- •.I <br />1' <br />- ~, , I <br />~. <br />1_ <br />., ~: j , <br />~. C <br />67 <br />0 100 700 300 SOD 500 600 700 800 900 <br />, , , , , <br />