My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52648
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52648
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:22 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:24:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/13/1992
Doc Name
Drainage Reconstruction, Improvement & Repairs
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix W 1991 Report Section 3.0
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Postmine herbaceous canopy cover, herbaceous production, and woody stem density were evaluated in <br />reconstructed drainage areas in 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991, and compared to sample data from undisturbed <br />premine drainage areas. (Sampling was conducted on drainageways rewnstructed in 1987.) Various post- <br />mine drainage treatments were incorporated to evaluate vegetation response on topsoiled, non-topsoiled, <br />irrigated, and non-irrigated drainage segments (Table 1). Treatments on undisturbed areas were irrigated <br />and non-irrigated drainage segments (Table 1). Generally, vegetation measurements were lower in recon- <br />structed drainageways than in undisturbed drainage sites in the initial growing season. However, by the end <br />of the third growing season vegetation parameters on reclaimed drainage areas were equal to or exceeded <br />those measured on undisturbed drainage areas. A list of plant species encountered in reclaimed drainages <br />and in undisturbed drainages is provided in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. <br />Vegetation response was the best on topsoiled and irrigated treatments and was significanty higher when <br />comparing topsoiled versus non-topsoiled areas without irrigation. The overall herbaceous canopy cover for <br />all reconstructed drainage treatments in 1988 (measure of initial growing season) was 39% compared to <br />71% on undisturbed drainage segments. In 1989, herbaceous canopy cover had increased to 60% in recon- <br />structed drainages and decreased on undisturbed drainage segments to 69% cover. Herbaceous canopy <br />cover within postmine drainageways and in undisturbed drainages was equal al 65% in 1990. In 1991, <br />herbaceous canopy cover measured 71%within undisturbed drainages and 66% in reclaimed drainages. <br />Herbaceous primary production averaged 876 Ibs/acre in reconstructed drainages and 1943 lbs/acre on <br />undisturbed sites in 1988. In 1989, herbaceous primary production decreased to 420 Ibs/acre on recon- <br />structed drainages and 521 Ibs/acre on undisturbed drainage segments. The reduction in production in 1989 <br />compared to 1988 was a result of severe drought conditions in the area during 1989. Herbaceous primary <br />production averaged 1712 pounds/acre in postmine drainages and 1629 pounds/acre in undisturbed <br />drainages in 1990. In 1991, herbaceous production was 1,802 pounds/acre in undisturbed drainages and <br />• 2,545 pounds/acre in reclaimed channels. <br />Woody stem densities on undisturbed drainage areas averaged 4888 stems/acre (or all three years compared <br />to 471 stems/acre in 1988, 897 stems/acre in 1989, and 104 stems/acre in 1990 and 1,945 stems/acre <br />(stems/acre are planted densities, not actual survival) on reconstructed drainage areas. <br />Flow rates have been significantly reduced following the installation of stock tanks and dozer basins on <br />reclaim and spoil areas, respectively. Discharge readings were recorded from a 10-year, 24-hour parshall <br />Flume (with Stevens Water Level Recorder) located in the north end of the Coyote Gulch reconswcted <br />drainage channel. The peak flow in 1987 (22.24 cfs) occurred as a result of a high intensity thunderstorm in <br />June (.74" ppt) and caused severe erosion within the newly regraded drainage channel In 1988, following <br />drainage reconstruction and water retention strategies, the peak flow rate associated with a .53" precipita- <br />tionevent (June) registered .04 cfs of discharge water. Similarly, a high intensity thunderstorm in July 1989 <br />(.75" ppt) resulted in a discharge of 1.23 cfs. The peak flow in 1990 and 1991 was 1.78 cfs and 1.38 cfs <br />respectively and occurred during March. In addition to assisting in runoff control, the proper frequency and <br />distribution of livestock ponds has aided in evenly spreading big game animal and livestock use over the <br />entire reclaimed area, thus reducing their impact on vegetation establishment. <br />Gully formation and sediment loss was significantly reduced in postmine drainageways when compared to <br />pre-drainage reconstruction. In Coyote Gulch, for example, an estimated 99,400 cubic yards of sediment <br />was lost to gutty erosion and sheet and rill erosion from 1984-1987. Following treatment an estimated 1,360 <br />cu yds of sediment is lost annualty to sheet, rill and gully erosion. This is a reduction in the annual erosion <br />rate of 24 times the pre-treatment erosion rates. Much of the success for the reduction in erosion rates must <br />be attributed to the wide variety of erosion wntrol materials, methods and sediment reducing measures that <br />were used in reconstructing drafnageways and adjacent reclaimed sideslopes. <br />As a result of appropriate erosion control treatment in reestablished postmine drainageways, Trapper Mine <br />has not needed to clean a single sediment pond in tour years. A net savings to Trapper Mine of $270,000 <br />has been realized since drainage reconstruction was initiated and sedimentation pond cleaning ceased. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.