My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52560
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52560
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:18 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:22:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/15/2002
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit J Other Licenses and Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PART II <br />Page 18 <br />• Permit No. COG-850000 <br />A. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS <br />5. Bwass (continued) <br />a) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, <br />or severe property damage; <br />b) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the <br />use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated <br />wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment <br />downtime. This condition is not satisfied if the permittee could <br />have installed adequate backup equipment to prevent a bypass <br />which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or <br />preventative maintenance; and <br />c) The permittee submitted notices as required in "Bypass <br />Notification", Part II.A.6. <br />6. Bypass Notification <br />If the <br />• shall <br />to the <br />bypass <br />by the <br />permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, a nor_ice <br />~e submitted, at least ten days before the date of the bypass, <br />Division and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The <br />shall be subject to Division approval and limitations imposed <br />Division and EPA. <br />7. Upsets <br />a) Effect of an Upset <br />An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought <br />for noncompliance with permit effluent limitations if the <br />requirements of paragraph b of this section are met. (No <br />determination made during administrative review of claims that <br />noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for <br />noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial <br />review.) <br />b) Conditions Necessary for a Demonstration of Upset <br />A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of <br />upset shall demonstrate through properly signed contemporaneous <br />operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: <br />(i) An upset occurred and chat the permittee can identify the <br />specific cause(s) of the upset; and <br />• (ii) The permitted facility was at the time being properly <br />operated; artd <br />J-21i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.