My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52521
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52521
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:17 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:21:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
NH1 TAB 13 ATTACHMENT B SEDIMENTATION POND 001
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• structure. In these cases, a conservative procedure was used; the <br />structure was analyzed for the largest anticipated drainage area that <br />will contribute runoff to the structure. This condition usually occurs <br />at the start of mining and again during the reclamation period. <br />SCS Curve Numbers ' <br />SCS curve numbers were estimated for each subwatershed based on the <br />cover type, percent vegetation cover, hydrologic conditions, and <br />hydrologic soil type. Several sources were used to obtain this data: <br />1. Cover Type - Aerial photographs of the mine site were used to <br />identify the existing cover type. Maps delineating the <br />proposed mining plan were used to identify areas that will be <br />disturbed by mining. Three general categories of cover type <br />were used: undisturbed, disturbed, and reclaimed. Further <br />sub-classifications were made in each category as shown in <br />Table 2. <br />The cover type (and the tributary drainage area) for some <br />• structures will vary throughout the life of the structure as <br />mining and subsequent reclamation occurs. Far these cases, <br />the anticipated worst condition is assumed for the hydrologic <br />analysis. Usually the worst condition is the maximum <br />disturbed area at the end of the mining activity and just <br />prior to the start of land reclamation. <br />2. Percent Vegetation Cover - The percent of ground sur#ace <br />covered by vegetation in undisturbed areas was estimated from <br />field inspections and aerial photographs. <br />3. Hydrologic Condition - The hydrologic condition was directly <br />related to the percent vegetation cover as shown in Table 2. <br />4. Hydrologic Soil Type - Soil survey maps, as contained in lab 9 <br />of the current Mine Plan, provides the basis of determining <br />the hydrologic soil type (see Table 3). <br />The data described above was collected and compiled for each <br />subwatershed (see Addendums A and B). Cover types and hydrologic soil <br />types were delineated on topographic maps showing the drainage area <br />• contributing to each structure. A curve number was assigned to each <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.