My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52521
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52521
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:17 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:21:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
NH1 TAB 13 ATTACHMENT B SEDIMENTATION POND 001
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• effort to be conservative, Peabody will use the largest soil erodibility <br />factor of 0.32 at this time for design purposes (see Table 3). <br />Length - Slope Factors (L,S) <br />Length and Slope Factors for each subwatershed were determined by <br />measuring representative overland flow paths on topo maps within the <br />subwatershed and taking an average of these measurements. As a general <br />rule, lengths varied from 200 feet to 800 feet and slopes from 3 percent <br />to 12 percent. <br />Control Practice Factor (CP) <br />The control practice factor for most soils and vegetation cover <br />combinations ranges from 0.10 to 0.90. Again, in an effort to be <br />conservative, Peabody will use 1.0 as the control practice factor on all <br />subwatersheds at this time. <br />Particle Size Distributions <br />• The particle size distribution for this sediment pond was taken from <br />Simons, Li and Associates (Design of Sediment Control Measures for Small <br />Areas in Surface Coal Mining). This distribution is representative of a <br />sandy loam soil similar to those described in Tab 9 of the current Nucla <br />Mine Plan. The specific gravity of the soil and the submerged bulk <br />specific gravity were estimated based on the references cited above. <br />STORAGE CAPACITY <br />The storage capacity of Sediment Pond 001 was also analyzed using the <br />SEDIMOT II computer program. The capacity of this pond was designed to <br />provide storage for the runoff entering the pond as the result of a <br />10-year, 24-hour precipitation event plus the inflow from potential pit <br />pumpage while maintaining a minimum of 0.5-feet of freeboard from the <br />emergency spillway elevation. This design also includes a minimum <br />storage volume for sediment. When periodic sediment surveys of this <br />pond indicate one or less 10-year, 24-hour MUSLE sediment storage <br />availability, the pond will be dewatered and the accumulated sediment <br />removed. Table 4 is a summary of the designed storage capacity. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.