Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Page 3 <br />12. We request a written, certified geological report on what we believe to be a possible hazard to our <br />safety, the rock cliffs in our back yard are very close to our back door. <br />13. The potential for seismic activity is present due to the configuration of many fault lines. <br />14. No current dimensions of the sandstone quarry were given in the re-submitted (amended) <br />application. <br />1 ~. Quantity of topsoil has been systematically side-stepped by applicant. <br />16. I do not believe that a commercial building can remain on the property upon reclamation, since <br />it is not zoned commercial by Fremont County. <br />17. Proof of adequate water is only shown for the first 4 years -not for the life of the mine which is <br />rated at 50 yeazs. <br />18. Applicant has avoided a commitmentto salvaging all topsoil possible and has not committed to <br />reclaiming any specific amount of land. <br />19. Any construction involving the wetlands azea of Tallahassee Creek must take place during the <br />colder winter months to avoid the disastrous results that would occur during the flash flooding <br />that warm weather brings. <br />20. My husband's adjudicated spring can be considered a well. If high sediment wash water is <br />dumped into the applicant's gravel pit, it will without doubt, adversely affect his well. <br />21. Storm water going over the crossing structure proposed by the applicant would wash it out and <br />it would be carried into the Arkansas River if water goes over the top of it. <br />22. The 200-foot right-of--way the applicant is referring to is actually a railroad easement that is <br />measured from the center of the tracks 100 feet to each side of the tracks. My husband's fence <br />is a ground surveyed fence line that is 100 feet from the railroad track center line. The applicant's <br />fence line lies 50 feet into the railroad easement. <br />23. I am concerned that Agile submitted to testing schedule or speci fic pol lution criteria for their well <br />monitoring. <br />24. 1 am worried about possible ground contamination from the refueling and possible over filling <br />of the gas tanks on their mobile equipment. <br />25. If high sediment wash water is dumped into the applicant's gravel pit, added turbidity in my <br />spring will be caused by the gravel pit operation. <br />26. In the original version, the application proposed three separate phases of reclamation. The <br />authors now call for reclamation only after all mining operations have been completed. <br />