My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52321
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:56:09 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:18:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979070
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/6/1979
Doc Name
MEMO ROSSUM PIT LARIMER CNTY APPLICATION FOR MINING AND RECLAMATION PERMIT
From
DWR
To
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~C III IIIIII III I'11111 <br />• • 999 <br />RICHARD D. LAMM C.J. KUIPER <br />1-^ 1 <br />Governor ~~ O State Engineer <br />#~~ # <br />QF~~* <br />* 1826 ; <br />DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES <br />Department of Natural Resources ~ ~ a t. ~ p~ I <br />1313 Sherman Slreet -Room 818 ~. ~~~ ~,., ~ l~~ ^'~~ <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Administration (303) 839-3581 <br />Ground Water (303) 839-3587 I <br />July 6, 1979 <br />COitl. LEHt. lil ;4:iD.%c! `a5T'IC2S <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: HARRIS SHERMAN, SECRETARY, MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />FROM: DR. JERIS A. DANIELSON, DEPUTY STATE ENGINEER <br />SUBJECT: ROSSUM PTT, LARIMER COUNTY, APPLICATION FOR MINING AND <br />RECLAMATION PERMTT <br />As requested by your office, we have reviewed the application for a gravel <br />pit near Loveland. The applicant stated in Exhibit G that he owns a water <br />right (W-4099, Division 1 Water Court) for irrigation and livestock watering, <br />but mentioned no rights for dust control on the crushers, for gravel washing, <br />or for other mining or industrial purposes. Exhibit G also states that "evapo- <br />ration losses will be replaced by augmentation", but does not state the <br />amount of water to be augmented or how augmentation would be accomplished. <br />The right mentioned above is so junior that it would be almost useless for <br />augmentation because when augmentation would be required, the right would <br />undoubtedly be out of priority. The applicant should provide an acceptable <br />augmentation plan prior to Board app{oval of the permit. <br />~.~ <br />is A. Danielson <br />JAD/SSH:mvf <br />cc: Jim Clark, Div. Eng. <br />Thompson Valley Water Users Assoc, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.