HYDRO22829

• Permit No: C1981008
• IBM Index Class Name: Hydrology
• Doc Date: 9/26/1994
• Doc Name: 3rd Quarter 2004 Sediment Pond Inspection Report
• Permit Index Doc Type: SEDIMENT POND INSPECTIONS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

PERIODIC INSPECTION FORM
WATER, SEDIMENT, OR SLURRY IMPOUNDMENTS
Inspectors Names bass G-~bk-^-
NPDES ID. No.: rmoz~? Cb7
Facility Configuration:_-r~s~~ r ,.,~
Site Name: Impoundment t e,~7
Mine Name: New Horizon Mine Western Fuels-Co
Mine ID Nm.:CMLRD Permit 10008-B1
Owners Rep.: R, L. Wade, Mine Manager
Date: 9, zz-4q-
Date Last Inspected: L;,,_ q~
Locations
Location:2 mi. NW of Nucla, Co.
CIRCLE OR WRITE IN APPROPRIATE RESPONSE
I. Foundation Preparation (removal of vegetation, stumps, topsoil) Ye No N/A
2. Lift thickness (inches) : / Z ~./ Yes No N/A
3. Cmmpaction according tm approved plan: Les% No N!A
4. Burning (specify extent and location): Yes ~ N/A
5. Angle of slope: 3:1 upstream, 3:1 downstream, Total = 6:1
6. Seepage (specify location, color, and approx. volume)
From underdrain pipes; Yes No ~~
At isolated points on embankment slopes: Yes ~ N/A
At natural hillside: Yes ~ N1A
Over widespread areas: Yes m N/A
From downstream foundation area: Yes N/A
"Boils" beneath stream or ponded water: Yes C~ N/A
7. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes to N/A
8. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes ~No N/A
9. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes ~o N/A
10. tMajor erosion prohlems: Yes No N/A
11. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes gyp N/A
12. +Erasion of toe: Yes N/R
13. tWater impounded against toe: Yes ~
N N/A
14. Existing embankment freeboard (feet!: ~ _ Feet
I5. increase or decrease in water level (feet): Feet
Ib. _
Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream face: Yes N/A
l7. Visihle sumps or sinkholes in slurry surface: Yes N1A
18. tClogging
Spillway channels and pipes: Yes ~N.p N/A
Decant system: Yes ~ N/A
Diversion ditchess Yes N N/A
19. +Cracking or crushing of pipes
Spillway pipes: Yes ~ N/A
Decant system: Yes NJA
20. Trash racks clear and in plac O / es No N/A
tMajor adverse changes to th could Apllsk instability and should be reported
to the Chief Engineer and ine ~~r u 'he evaluation. Adverse conditions
noted in these items sho no a d i,b d (extent, location, volume, etc.)
on page two of this inspection f ~,~ ~ / ~i