My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-06-16_PERMIT FILE - M2000002 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2000002
>
2000-06-16_PERMIT FILE - M2000002 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 12:51:04 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:17:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000002
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/16/2000
Doc Name
APPLICANTS PRE-HEARING STATEMENT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I. Statutory Standard for the Board's Review of Application No. M-2000-002 Requires <br />that the Board Approve the Application. <br />The Board "is an administrative agency that may act only within the authorization of its <br />organic legislation." O'Connor v. Rolfes, 899 P.2d. 277 (Colo. App. Oct. 6,1994); reh'ing denied <br />(Nov. 3, 1994); cert. denied (July 31, 1995). The Construction Materials statute codified at <br />Section 34-32.5-101 et se . is the source of the Boazd's authority to issue mined land permits for <br />the mining and reclamation of sand and gravel operations in the State. As set forth in Section 34- <br />32.5-115(4), C.R.S., the Boazd "shall not deny a permit except in one or more" of the situations <br />listed immediately below. None of these exist in the case being considered by the Boazd. The <br />appropriate course of action therefore left to the Boazd is the approval, as recommended by <br />DMG staff, of Application No. M-2000-002. <br />More specifically, the Board is required to deny an application if: <br />(a) it is incomplete and the performance and financial warranties have not been <br />provided; <br />(b) the applicant has not paid the required fee; <br />(c) any part of the proposed mining operation, the reclamation program, or the <br />proposed future use is contrary to the Boazd's laws or regulations; <br />(d) the proposed mining, reclamation, or the proposed future use is contrary to the <br />laws or regulations of Colorado or the United States, including, but not limited to <br />all federal, state, and local permits, licenses, and approvals, as applicable to the <br />specific operation; <br />(e) the mining operation will adversely affect the stability of any significant, <br />valuable, and permanent manmade structures located within two hundred (200) <br />feet of the affected land; t <br />(f) the mining operation will be located on various State or federal pazk, preservation <br />or recreational lands; or <br />(g) the proposed reclamation does not conform to the performance standards set forth <br />in Section 34-32.5-116, C.R.S. <br />None of the objections in this case, as discussed below, implicate the statutory conditions <br />for permit denial where Application M-2000-002 is concerned. Therefore the Board is required, <br />by law, to approve the application and issue the permit. <br />The Board shall not deny a permit on this basis where there is an agreement between the operator and the <br />persons having an interest in the structure, or where the operator demonstrates through an appropriate engineering <br />analysis that no damage will result to the structure. Section 34-32.5-I IS(4)(e), C.R.S. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.