My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE52056
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE52056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:55:59 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:11:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 20 AQUATIC BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MIDDLE CREEK AND FISH CREEK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i the lab where the organisms were sorted from the debris, identified and <br />counted. The Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index (D) was calculated for the <br />I invertebrates using the formula found in Weber (1973). <br />Fish populations were sampled qualitatively by making one pass with <br />1 backpack electrofishing gear through 100m sections at each station, except <br />Station 1 on Middle Creek where 25m were sampled. Fish captured were identi- <br />~ fied and counted. <br />MACROPHYTES <br />Aquatic macrophytes are generally uncommon in Rocky Mountain streams <br />due primarily to the lack of suitable substrate for root growth and the <br />abrasive action of the turbulent currents. However, where current slows <br />I down and substrate is finer (i. e., sand and silt), rooted aquatic plants can <br />1 develop. Although important as habitat, these plants are most commonly used <br />as a food source by invertebrates when they die back, not when living. When <br />present, they are a source of detritus, which is an important food source of <br />the majority of benthic invertebrates. <br />Aquatic macrophytes were common in Middle Creek. Emergent species such <br />as sedge (Carex nebraskensis) and spike-rush (Eleocharis macrostachya) <br />growing along the edge of the stream were the primary representatives at all <br />three stations (Fig. 2, 3 and 4). Station 2 did have a few small beds of <br />submerged pondweed (Potamogeton pectinatus) in riffle sections (Fig. 3). <br />~ Fish Creek was ve etated with a vatic emer ent macro h tes <br />g q g p y (Carex <br />~ nebraskensis and Eleocharis macrostachya) along the edge of the stream (Fig. <br />5 and 6). Station 1 had two small beds of pondweed in riffle sections of <br />the stream (Fig. 5). Station 2 had two large, dense beds of pondweed and <br />two other smaller beds in the stream (Fig. 6) along with a small patch of <br />the alga Chara globularis, which is considered to be a macrophyte due to its <br />j large size. <br />• <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.