HYDRO22666

• Permit No: C1980005
• IBM Index Class Name: Hydrology
• Doc Date: 7/13/1989
• Doc Name: 2nd Qtr 1989 Inspections
• From: PEABODY COAL CO
• To: MLRD
• Permit Index Doc Type: SEDIMENT POND INSPECTIONS
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

PERIODIC INSPECTION FORK
Water, Sediment, or Slurry Impoundments
INSPECTOR'S NAME: Dennis Jones DATE: 5/17/89 ~~
NPDES I.D. NO.: - .P .O
FACILITY CONFIG Cross-Va ey Pon DATE LAST INSPECTION: 3/21/89
SITE NAME: Pond #008 LOCATION:S W'/.NW'/~, Sec. 7, T5N, R W
MINE NAME: eneca ine ea o y oa o LOCATION: mi, or ay en,
MINE I.D. N .. ermi - - OWNER'S R .. on u ion, up .
Circle or write in appropriate response
1. Foundation preparation (removal of vegetation, stumps, topsoil): _ es No N/A
2. Lift thickness: 12 in. N/A
3. Compaction according to approved plan: © No N/A
4. Burning (specify extent and location): Yes No
5. Angle of slope: 3:1 upstream, 3:1 downstream Total = 6:1 N/A
6. *Seepage (specify location, color, and approximate volume)
From underdrain pipes: Yes No
At isolated points on em an men s opes: Yes CND N/A
At natural hillside: Yes G~ N/A
Over widespread areas: Yes ~~~ppp7 N/A
From downstream foundation area: Yes N/A
"Boils" beneath stream or ponded wa er: Yes N/A
7. Cracks or scarps on crest: Yes No N/A
8. Cracks or scarps on slope: Yes ~~ N/A
9. Sloughing or bulging on slope: Yes ® N/A
10. *Major erosion problems: Yes No N/A
11. Surface movements in valley bottom or on hillside: Yes ~ N/A
12. *Erosion of toe: Yes J~ N/A
13. *Water impounded against toe: Yes Jo N/A
14. Existing embankment freeboard: 8.4 feet
15. Increase _~ Decrease in water level: ~_ feet
16. Cracks, bulging, or erosion on upstream fare: Yes ~ N/A
17. Visible sumps or sinkholes in slurry surface: Yes No N/
18. *Clogging
Spillway channels and pipes: Yes ® N/A
Decant system: Yes No
F~

Diversion ditches:
Yes
No C
,aJ
19. *Cracking or crushing of pipes
Spillway pipes: Yes ® N/A
Decant system: Yes No
20. Trash racks clear and in place: es No N/A
*Major adverse changes in these items could cause instability and should be reported to
the Engineering Manager and Mine Superintendent for further evaluation. Adverse condi-
tions noted in these items should normally be described (extent, location, volume, etc.)
in the space on the back of this sheet.